If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
sorry for my ignorance but There is any advantage from "Boolean Dependencies" over a satsolver for boolean satisfiability problem (As used by libzypp)? Or is it just a deb packaging option to be used in rpms?
sorry for my ignorance but There is any advantage from "Boolean Dependencies" over a satsolver for boolean satisfiability problem (As used by libzypp)?
it is not solver, it is boolean expressions for specifying deps. like requires packagea or packageb
sorry for my ignorance but There is any advantage from "Boolean Dependencies" over a satsolver for boolean satisfiability problem (As used by libzypp)? Or is it just a deb packaging option to be used in rpms?
It is used in rpm spec files and described here. It seems to be actually very useful to handle dependencies, especially with if.
Comment