Systemd 228 Ships New Features

[SystemCrasher]

Don't underestimate the assholeness of the systemd developers.

Not anyhow close to that of systemd haters, who never gave a fuck about shitload of technical issues and challenges, mumbling "who needs this crap?" and "go code it yourself!". Now its time to face the result of your arrogant and ignorant attitude and face consequences...

[rtfazeberdee]

Don't underestimate the assholeness of the systemd developers.
No, they wouldn't want it to be called systemd/Linux, they would just pull Linux into their repository (as they did with udev) and simply call it just systemd.

Yawn..... trolling systemd and its developers has got really stale and boring.

[edmon]

if is's not kitchen sink it not worth to mention

[caligula]

Awesome, looking forward to putting the "you forgot to mention GNU" issue to rest.

Well systemd requires GNU libc, it doesn't work with other, standards compliant libc libraries. It's very much GNU.

[xeekei]

Well systemd requires GNU libc, it doesn't work with other, standards compliant libc libraries. It's very much GNU.

This is my biggest complaint with systemd. I'd love to see musl support.

[unixfan2001]

This is my biggest complaint with systemd. I'd love to see musl support.

Well. It's not the software's job to be compatible with every C standard library on this planet. It's the libraries job to seek compatibility.

[RahulSundaram]

This is my biggest complaint with systemd. I'd love to see musl support.

Patches already exist and you can use them if you want to

https://github.com/kraj/meta-musl/tree/master/recipes-core/systemd/systemd

Some of them were upstreamed but it has to be more than disabling some features for upstream to accept it.

[eplight]

This is my biggest complaint with systemd. I'd love to see musl support.

Not going to happen until "alternative libc" devs realize that refusing to put even minimal effort to be somewhat compatible with glibc for absolutely no good reason is just plain stupid.

[mirex]

Don't underestimate the assholeness of the systemd developers.
No, they wouldn't want it to be called systemd/Linux, they would just pull Linux into their repository (as they did with udev) and simply call it just systemd.

They already are called - Lenux, to distinguish those systems from Linux