Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Canonical Comes Up With Its Own FUSE Filesystem For Linux Containers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • timtas
    replied
    Originally posted by magika View Post
    Yea, and because of that developing their own CLA'ed filesystem is a good idea.
    I think it a very good idea actually, as fuse is a well-tested kernel infrasctructure and IMHO the best approach for virtual filesystems, certainly much better than all that gvfs crap, dependending on everything plus the kitchen sink to get something done.

    Leave a comment:


  • magika
    replied
    Originally posted by jaxxed View Post
    He's probably trying to refer to this as another case of Canonical developing their own version of an existing product. They are in effect reproducing the docker product, although sticking with LXC.

    I for one think that it's a good idea, as the docker guys are kind of trying to lead the community in their own direction, which some people don't like (desktop devs in particular.) In particular, their abandoning of LXC upset some folks. I think that some more competition in this new container software area is a good thing. Their is another group pushing LXC/cGroup containers, but the names has slipped my brain.
    Yea, and because of that developing their own CLA'ed filesystem is a good idea.

    Leave a comment:


  • jaxxed
    replied
    Originally posted by rikkinho View Post
    why?
    He's probably trying to refer to this as another case of Canonical developing their own version of an existing product. They are in effect reproducing the docker product, although sticking with LXC.

    I for one think that it's a good idea, as the docker guys are kind of trying to lead the community in their own direction, which some people don't like (desktop devs in particular.) In particular, their abandoning of LXC upset some folks. I think that some more competition in this new container software area is a good thing. Their is another group pushing LXC/cGroup containers, but the names has slipped my brain.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by rikkinho View Post
    why?
    Canonical obviously threw his entire bloodline into bankruptcy

    Not sure what's worse; debates about systemd, or complaints about Canonical/Ubuntu...

    Leave a comment:


  • TheSoulz
    replied
    Originally posted by rikkinho View Post
    why?
    beacuse canonical killed hes kitty, why else?

    Leave a comment:


  • rikkinho
    replied
    ?

    Originally posted by gnufreex View Post
    Canical is trully useless company. Now it is official.
    why?

    Leave a comment:


  • gnufreex
    replied
    Canical is trully useless company. Now it is official.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pajn
    replied
    Interesting. Hopefully the Apache license and Github hosting can make it gain traction.

    Leave a comment:


  • Canonical Comes Up With Its Own FUSE Filesystem For Linux Containers

    Phoronix: Canonical Comes Up With Its Own FUSE Filesystem For Linux Containers

    Canonical has been developing LXCFS, a FUSE-based file-system for LXC containers that will premiere with the upcoming release of Ubuntu 15.04...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
Working...
X