Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Does VirtualBox VM Have Much A Future Left?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • phoronix
    started a topic Does VirtualBox VM Have Much A Future Left?

    Does VirtualBox VM Have Much A Future Left?

    Phoronix: Does VirtualBox VM Have Much A Future Left?

    It's been a long time since last hearing of any major innovations or improvements to VirtualBox, the VM software managed by Oracle since their acquisition of Sun Microsystems. Is there any hope left for a revitalized VirtualBox?..

    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...-Features-2015

  • bitman
    replied
    Also Qemu isnt that useful without kvm (meaning on windows). Stuff like virtio/vfio are invaluable.

    Leave a comment:


  • reCAPTCHA
    replied
    Originally posted by Mandrake View Post
    Qemu has unofficial windows builds from last month. VMware Player is free and not reasonably more difficult than Virtualbox to use.
    VMware Player? Despite It received some feature updates in the last time, like ability to create a VM, SSD pass trough etc, it is still not in the same class as VB, which offers a lot more than basics provided by Player.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mandrake
    replied
    Originally Posted by ormaaj
    To my knowledge Virtualbox is the only maintained, reasonably simple to use, free virtual machine of its kind for Windows. The unofficial windows builds of qemu have been stagnant for years so it's probably no longer viable.
    Qemu has unofficial windows builds from last month. VMware Player is free and not reasonably more difficult than Virtualbox to use.

    Leave a comment:


  • ormaaj
    replied
    Originally posted by SystemCrasher View Post
    Basically I do not get who will develop VBox and why they will do it.
    To my knowledge Virtualbox is the only maintained, reasonably simple to use, free virtual machine of its kind for Windows. The unofficial windows builds of qemu have been stagnant for years so it's probably no longer viable. For those that have no option but Windows (e.g. corporate policy), and cannot use hyper-v for whatever reason, virtualbox may be the only option. As I recall, virtualbox doesn't even require administrative permissions to install and run, but it's been years since I've checked.


    This indicates to me that virtualbox fills a significant need and it's likely somebody will be motivated to maintain it. I do wish there were still a qemu windows port though.

    Leave a comment:


  • SystemCrasher
    replied
    Originally posted by duby229 View Post
    Yes, sounds like the future is almost here. I've been waiting for the future since the past. I'm so excited!
    And, somehow, it means even more competiton for VBox. So it going to have hard times I guess. Regardless of what Oracle employees are mumbling.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zoom
    replied
    Originally posted by jelabarre59 View Post
    Virtualized USB drives (bootable).
    Actually, you can boot from USB drive, but, strangely, not with the GUI.
    It's done by creating a virtual disk attached to the drive, and then booting from it.
    https://gist.github.com/mapio/8470611

    Here's windows how-to:
    http://www.howtogeek.com/187721/how-...in-virtualbox/

    Leave a comment:


  • jelabarre59
    replied
    Originally posted by GreatEmerald View Post
    What is VirtualBox missing, exactly? Aside from VGA passthrough, I suppose; but then it's becoming less and less needed, given the advances in Wine and a wider variety of native games.
    Virtualized USB drives (bootable). For example, if you were trying out some OS being provided as a USB-image download, you shouldn't have to hunt down and write the image down to a physical drive. You should be able to test them out directly from the image. For that matter, I don't even remember if you ban boot from USAB at all. It also would be useful to *create* those images this way. I requested it years ago and all I got was a whiney response that they couldn't think of a use case.

    They also added code to support certificates in MSWindows, but they failed to make it an option that could be SHUT OFF in case it conflicted with security code already on the system. All the vbox people do is whine that you need to remove the other offending code (as if you could on a work machine) rather than fixing it on their end (it has a serious conflict with Symantec software).

    I'd think getting outside developers writing 3rd-party extension packs would be a great benefit to VBox over other virtualization options. The BSD, OS2/ecomstation, ReactOS, etc projects could make their OSes work great in a VM.

    Leave a comment:


  • ultimA
    replied
    Originally posted by michael-vb View Post
    ...I think there must be some confusion here, there are definitely more than four of us! I think reports of our death must have been slightly, should I say, exaggerated? I won't go into too any detail, but as one commenter said, take a look at our svn log to see what we are working on. Hope you will enjoy the results!
    , don't worry about it, Michael just loves to post "news" like this time-to-time, just to stir up the forums. VirtualBox is still a great product. Sure, some other virtualization solutions work better in/for some situations, but VirtualBox also has its unique selling points. I don't care if you are paid developers or not, I am convinced you are doing us a great a service by developing this (mostly) free software. Keep up the good work and thank you.
    Last edited by ultimA; 02-02-2015, 06:49 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • benjamins
    replied
    Originally posted by nanonyme View Post
    Did you try out dosbox instead? It would most likely be faster than virtualbox and folks
    No, currently I've been using the free VMware Player. It's BIOS implementation doesn't have bugs and detects drive errors correctly.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X