Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

14 Staging Drivers Get Nuked From Linux 3.17

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by droidhacker View Post
    Stagnant isn't necessarily a bad thing. In some cases, it means "it works".
    ... which it does.
    Er, that is to say, NOT the one in the kernel, which actually *does not* work.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by droidhacker View Post
      Stagnant isn't necessarily a bad thing. In some cases, it means "it works".
      ... which it does.
      I agree.

      However, staging tree isn't meant for already 'stable' and ready drivers, drivers are there for a reason.
      That can be for any number of reasons, using obsolete API, bad coding practice, having design problems etc.
      If reasons why these are in staging are fixed, they go in, if these are not fixed, they get nuked from space.

      Comment


      • #13
        If Broadcom can't be arsed to hire some third world coder to at least tidy up their driver for inclusion outside of staging they can keep that hardware(and shove it in any and all orifices). Christ, what would it cost, $10000 a year for some part time employ in India or Taiwan to keep the code maintained. They could kickstart it if they're too damn cheap to come out of pocket.

        Comment


        • #14
          Where did Guido G?nther go?

          Crystal HD Decodes New Linux Support Improvements

          Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite


          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by Sonadow View Post
            Not a chance.

            I'll just slap Windows on any machine that uses it (where possible). At least Broadcom supports their CrystalHD hardware with official drivers on Windows.
            What are you talking about? The latest driver for Windows was released in 2011, if it works on Windows 8 or newer it's pure luck, just like it would be with any of the external drivers for Linux. Face it, this product has reached the state of "abandonware". If it stops working with newer kernels stick to the last one that works or get rid of that crap.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by halfmanhalfamazing View Post
              Crystal HD Decodes New Linux Support Improvements

              Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite


              http://honk.sigxcpu.org/con/CrystalHD_progress.html
              He hasn't gone anywhere. He's just not working on CrystalHD and nobody else is either, including Broadcom. It's dead hardware with no support from the manufacturer and Broadcom hasn't even manufactured the product for several years due to absolutely no demand for it since the niche it was intended to fill no longer exists.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Ansla View Post
                What are you talking about? The latest driver for Windows was released in 2011, if it works on Windows 8 or newer it's pure luck, just like it would be with any of the external drivers for Linux. Face it, this product has reached the state of "abandonware". If it stops working with newer kernels stick to the last one that works or get rid of that crap.
                Unlike Linux, one can install XP-era drivers on Windows 8.1 and still have them work almost perfectly.

                And I'm doing that right one with an antique SiS WiFi stick that ceased to be supported in Linux ever since the 2.6.x kernel series was released. That's more than 10 years of binary compatibility in Windows. So much for Linux being better suited for 'old hardware' if they have to be gotten rid of in half the time.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by Sonadow View Post
                  Unlike Linux, one can install XP-era drivers on Windows 8.1 and still have them work almost perfectly.

                  And I'm doing that right one with an antique SiS WiFi stick that ceased to be supported in Linux ever since the 2.6.x kernel series was released. That's more than 10 years of binary compatibility in Windows. So much for Linux being better suited for 'old hardware' if they have to be gotten rid of in half the time.
                  If a driver is that trivial and independent of the OS, chances are backporting it from 3.16 to newer kernels will be trivial aswell.

                  And Linux is better for old hardware, who says you have to use the latest kernel? The 2.6 kernel line is still maintained and getting bug/security fixes, which you can't say for winxp. At the end of the day the only thing windows let's you do is run unmaintained code long past it's expiration date.

                  Besides that the compatibility is crap, my old emu10k soundcard won't run at all on win8 with its xp drivers, and that was one hell of a common card back in the day, needless to say linux handles it truly plug and play, like advertised on the box. I'm thinking about returning it tbh, says WinME or newer, that's false advertising.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Sonadow View Post
                    Unlike Linux, one can install XP-era drivers on Windows 8.1 and still have them work almost perfectly.
                    Sometimes you can, sometimes you can't. My Epson scanner, for example, was completely broken by Vista.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Sonadow View Post
                      Unlike Linux, one can install XP-era drivers on Windows 8.1 and still have them work almost perfectly.

                      And I'm doing that right one with an antique SiS WiFi stick that ceased to be supported in Linux ever since the 2.6.x kernel series was released. That's more than 10 years of binary compatibility in Windows. So much for Linux being better suited for 'old hardware' if they have to be gotten rid of in half the time.
                      What part of "pure luck" is so hard for you to grasp? Unless Microsoft stated in their Windos XP EULA (which is the closest to a contract you have with them) that any driver written for that version of Windows will continue to work with all the future Windows versions in the next 10 years then it's just a coincidence.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X