Linux 3.12 Kernel Scheduler I/O Benchmarks

[mark45]

BFS ain't about speed, it's about the desktop staying responsive.

To this day the Linux kernel/OS randomly becomes worn out after I/O apparently because Linus wants the same scheduler to run on all setups, be it a supercomputer cluster or a PC, he deserves to be called an asshole for that.

[ryszardzonk]

I must say from those tests I can not decide which one is better as they are in almost every case identical. Only one that really stands out is first compile bench. I wonder where this 15% difference came from - 65 to 75 MBs between best and worst result

Anyways how about adding BFQ results as well?

[wargames]

Michael, a comparison against BFS would be nice.

[phoronix]

Phoronix: Linux 3.12 Kernel Scheduler I/O Benchmarks

Our latest benchmarks of the Linux 3.12 kernel are looking at the I/O performance between the Noop, CFQ, and Deadline schedulers on the latest Linux kernel when using the high-end Intel Core i7 4960X...

http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTQ4MzA