Originally posted by Luke_Wolf
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ubuntu Is Close To Recommending 64-Bit By Default
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by vk512 View PostThermal design is one thing, actual consumption (per watt efficiency) is another story. You don't read this on the CPU box, it needs testing. Now I guess Pentium III machines somehow died a while ago and PIV certainly died earlier from global warming. I am currently using an Athlon from 2005 (3200+) at 67w and Core 2 are good too with Xubuntu. As I said 90% of the people not playing mind-numbing games could be perfectly happy with such a smooth, if old, config.
This as a result eventually ended up killing almost all motherboards that were produced at the time thus putting that generation into the grave.Last edited by Luke_Wolf; 03 September 2013, 06:18 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vk512 View PostSo Ubuntu doesn't focus on older hardware? Then why did they try to set a 14.04 release date close to XP's EOL early next April? Sure it is not at all a focus for development (portable devices and cross-device is) but it is a prominent communication axis. Note that I was talking about old computers, not antique ones with under 512MB RAM (I used to put Slitaz on these but they didn't make it past 2010).
Leave a comment:
-
I don't say that it would be less smooth, I say that for the same amount of "smoothness", a modern computer would use far less power. Hell, you don't even need a discrete gpu anymore to have decent performance in non-intensive 3D performance.
Just look at Intel's NUC for instance...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by doom_Oo7 View Posthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...pation_figures
Not a single Core 2 was under 65 watts while Haswell can sometimes do as low as 15W (not on the i7 ofc).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by doom_Oo7 View PostI think it is better to buy a modern, slim, and not very powerful computer, like an i3-based one, but that will consume MUCH less power thus costing less in the long term than an ol' Pentium IV)
So Ubuntu doesn't focus on older hardware? Then why did they try to set a 14.04 release date close to XP's EOL early next April? Sure it is not at all a focus for development (portable devices and cross-device is) but it is a prominent communication axis. Note that I was talking about old computers, not antique ones with under 512MB RAM (I used to put Slitaz on these but they didn't make it past 2010).
Old computers still running XP (or Vista) can work very well with Mint or Xubuntu and look as a fresh AND full-fledged computer. Lots of people have simply installed one of these at their parents/grand-parents/... for the better (except this population will hardly advocate for GNU Linux, open source... since they simply have no education there and are plenty happy as passive consumers).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vk512 View Post(Celeron then Atom, and some AMD too)
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vk512 View PostLet's remember that older hardware rejuvenation has been the broaden Linux use beyond the geeks/tech-savvy people.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: