Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

XFS In Linux 3.10 To Put On Extra Protection

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • LightBit
    replied
    Originally posted by ryao View Post
    This is designed to protect metadata integrity. It will not make XFS protect your data anymore than it already does. That is to say, not at all.

    If you want data integrity, you should use ZFS.
    NILFS2 is also interesting for data integrity.

    Leave a comment:


  • RahulSundaram
    replied
    Originally posted by Candide View Post
    This interests me. I've used XFS before and it was always good, so I wouldn't mind abandoning ext4 and going back to XFS if there was some advantage in doing so. Data integrity is a big deal for me, and I'd rate it more important than performance (though good performance is always nice to). Actually, XFS does perform well. So I guess my next question is: does ext4 have CRC checking too, or is XFS the first?
    XFS isn't the first. Linux 3.5 introduced some checksums for metadata integrity in Ext4

    http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_3.5#h...a7b417333147f8

    Btrfs provides better data integrity but like all filesystems has its own set of tradeoffs.

    Leave a comment:


  • ryao
    replied
    Originally posted by Candide View Post
    This interests me. I've used XFS before and it was always good, so I wouldn't mind abandoning ext4 and going back to XFS if there was some advantage in doing so. Data integrity is a big deal for me, and I'd rate it more important than performance (though good performance is always nice to). Actually, XFS does perform well. So I guess my next question is: does ext4 have CRC checking too, or is XFS the first?
    This is designed to protect metadata integrity. It will not make XFS protect your data anymore than it already does. That is to say, not at all.

    If you want data integrity, you should use ZFS.

    Leave a comment:


  • kernelOfTruth
    replied
    Originally posted by Candide View Post
    This interests me. I've used XFS before and it was always good, so I wouldn't mind abandoning ext4 and going back to XFS if there was some advantage in doing so. Data integrity is a big deal for me, and I'd rate it more important than performance (though good performance is always nice to). Actually, XFS does perform well. So I guess my next question is: does ext4 have CRC checking too, or is XFS the first?
    ext4.wiki.kernel.org: Ext4 Metadata Checksums

    Leave a comment:


  • Candide
    replied
    Originally posted by RahulSundaram View Post
    CRC for metadata isn't designed for security. It is just a means of ensuring metadata integrity.
    This interests me. I've used XFS before and it was always good, so I wouldn't mind abandoning ext4 and going back to XFS if there was some advantage in doing so. Data integrity is a big deal for me, and I'd rate it more important than performance (though good performance is always nice to). Actually, XFS does perform well. So I guess my next question is: does ext4 have CRC checking too, or is XFS the first?

    Leave a comment:


  • RahulSundaram
    replied
    Originally posted by [Knuckles] View Post
    Crc for meta-data is cool and all that, but it's like saying "well, the trojan wiped all your data, but since it didn't get root, at least you don't need to reinstall your OS!".
    CRC for metadata isn't designed for security. It is just a means of ensuring metadata integrity.

    Leave a comment:


  • [Knuckles]
    replied
    Crc for meta-data is cool and all that, but it's like saying "well, the trojan wiped all your data, but since it didn't get root, at least you don't need to reinstall your OS!".

    Leave a comment:


  • phoronix
    started a topic XFS In Linux 3.10 To Put On Extra Protection

    XFS In Linux 3.10 To Put On Extra Protection

    Phoronix: XFS In Linux 3.10 To Put On Extra Protection

    The XFS file-system with the forthcoming Linux 3.10 kernel will have an experimental feature for CRC protection of meta-data...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTM2Mzg
Working...
X