Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

F2FS Benchmarks From USB Flash Storage

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • phoronix
    started a topic F2FS Benchmarks From USB Flash Storage

    F2FS Benchmarks From USB Flash Storage

    Phoronix: F2FS Benchmarks From USB Flash Storage

    Up to this point on Phoronix there have been F2FS benchmarks -- the new Linux file-system designed by Samsung as the Flash-Friendly File-System -- in the context of solid-state storage benchmarking against various other Linux file-systems and also tests done from SDHC storage. In this article are our first tests when benchmarking F2FS from a USB 3.0 flash drive and comparing the performance to other open-source Linux file-systems.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=18528

  • ostinPr
    replied
    Originally posted by shadowriver View Post
    Problem is usb mass storage only give direct access to data does not deal with file systems, means lot ofalready existing embedded devices will not able to read it. Its possible to switch but transition will take long.
    Exactly. Sometime it's good, sometime it's bad.

    Leave a comment:


  • shadowriver
    replied
    Originally posted by staalmannen View Post
    Lets just hope that Samsung goes "all in" on F2FS and releases drivers for Windows and MacOSX to ultimately replace FAT-based file systems in their devices (cameras, tablets, phones, TVs ...). If one major player starts breaking the unhealthy reliance of FAT, the world will be a better place.
    Problem is usb mass storage only give direct access to data does not deal with file systems, means lot ofalready existing embedded devices will not able to read it. Its possible to switch but transition will take long.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pallidus
    replied
    Originally posted by Michael View Post
    It's out-of-process so if anything F2FS vs. exFAT will be saved for its own, separate, multi-page article.

    you're out of process, this thread is out of process, this entire forum is out of process


    looking forward for that article, also, see how f2fs handles file errors and power failure etc compared to exfat both in sd and usb

    if you are afraid of corrupting large capacity usb keys sd cards I have some crappy and small ones here I can send

    Leave a comment:


  • dimko
    replied
    Originally posted by Ericg View Post
    Michael, why no FAT or NTFS benchmarks? Really the only filesystems on a traditional USB should be

    FAT (or exFat if its over 4GB), and thats for interoperability
    NTFS if its an external HDD via USB. Again for interoperability.
    Or if you only use Linux...F2FS. (Ext4 if you dont trust F2FS yet.)

    So we're kind of missing 2 out of the 4 filesystems for this >.>
    I can't answer for Michael, but I am guessing, it's because main reason of tests is not to show you which one is best, but rather to point at new one, that is specifically designed for Linux in mind with Samsung to support it.

    If Samsung are about to do this for their cameras and stuff - god knows how far standart may go. Since it's open source - it can be ported to Windows. Ext3 already is!(you need to install special driver for that, but you can mount ext3 and prolly ext4 too)

    Leave a comment:


  • Michael
    replied
    Originally posted by Pallidus View Post
    you are stubborn as a mule, everyone wants to see F2FS vs exFAT

    go to windows and format an exfat usb key or download the ubuntu driver


    how hard is that, ffs
    It's out-of-process so if anything F2FS vs. exFAT will be saved for its own, separate, multi-page article.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pallidus
    replied
    Originally posted by Michael View Post
    In terms of FAT, most of the disk benchmarks don't run on FAT. In terms of exFAT, there is no mainline kernel driver.


    you are stubborn as a mule, everyone wants to see F2FS vs exFAT

    go to windows and format an exfat usb key or download the ubuntu driver


    how hard is that, ffs

    Leave a comment:


  • Gordy
    replied
    Originally posted by Michael View Post
    In terms of FAT, most of the disk benchmarks don't run on FAT. In terms of exFAT, there is no mainline kernel driver.
    Yes, but ubuntu has support for exFAT.

    Leave a comment:


  • Michael
    replied
    Originally posted by Gordy View Post
    Michael,

    I agree with Ericg. It would be nice to see benchmarks including FAT, exFAT, and NTFS if possible (or even where they fall down).
    In terms of FAT, most of the disk benchmarks don't run on FAT. In terms of exFAT, there is no mainline kernel driver.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gordy
    replied
    FAT, exFAT and NTFS

    Michael,

    I agree with Ericg. It would be nice to see benchmarks including FAT, exFAT, and NTFS if possible (or even where they fall down).

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X