Adaptive Tickless Kernel Still Being Adapted

[uid313]

Oh really? I guess Weisbecker assumed wrong then?
According to the original article it sounded like it could be both an increase in battery and performance throughput:

Well, he probably knows more and better than me.
So he probably is right, and I am probably wrong.

I haven't read about the tickless kernel in years.

[Mystro256]

I believe there will be no performance boost at all.
Though, I do believe there will be savings on the battery.

Oh really? I guess Weisbecker assumed wrong then?
According to the original article it sounded like it could be both an increase in battery and performance throughput:

Weisbecker believes this adaptive tickless support will be of great benefit for high-performance computing, as it can optimize throughput by avoiding the overhead of the timer interrupt, and also for real-time uses with less interrupts being generated so a reduction in latency

[uid313]

I wonder, is it going to effect battery life or is it just a performance booster?

I believe there will be no performance boost at all.
Though, I do believe there will be savings on the battery.

[Mystro256]

I wonder, is it going to effect battery life or is it just a performance booster?

[uid313]

Not merged yet

Oh, it's not merged yet.

I remember seeing this years ago. I thought it was merged by now long ago.
I remember looking forward to this and being eager to see it.

[phoronix]

Phoronix: Adaptive Tickless Kernel Still Being Adapted

While in development for nearly two years without merging, the adaptive tickless Linux kernel support is still being developed...

http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTE2MzQ