Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The v2 Rotary Interactivity Favor Scheduler

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by darkbasic View Post
    Please move to git instead, noone wants to use svn anymore.
    +1 github is a good option imho

    btw: on subjective use, RIFS is faster than BFS (I've been comparing both for the last three days). stuff like rendering pdf pages are faster and video plays smoother while compiling. I'll have to measure dropped frames to be sure though.

    Chromium slows down sometimes (pseudo-freezes). I don't know if this is beeing caused by the scheduler (is chromium getting RR??) or by flash or by something else.

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by elmariachi View Post
      +1 github is a good option imho

      btw: on subjective use, RIFS is faster than BFS (I've been comparing both for the last three days). stuff like rendering pdf pages are faster and video plays smoother while compiling. I'll have to measure dropped frames to be sure though.

      Chromium slows down sometimes (pseudo-freezes). I don't know if this is beeing caused by the scheduler (is chromium getting RR??) or by flash or by something else.
      Hi.
      I m going to post RIFS-v3-RC5(Brain-Eating).
      Chen

      Comment


      • #73
        Latt result
        [admin@localhost ~]$ latt tester

        Parameters: min_wait=100ms, max_wait=500ms, clients=1
        Entries logged: 108

        Wakeup averages
        -------------------------------------
        Max 22 usec
        Avg 8 usec
        Stdev 2 usec
        Stdev mean 0 usec

        Work averages
        -------------------------------------
        Max 20326 usec
        Avg 20016 usec
        Stdev 85 usec
        Stdev mean 8 usec
        [admin@localhost ~]$
        [admin@localhost ~]$

        RIFS-V3-RC3(Brain-Eating), testing it with idle system.

        Comment


        • #74
          Will you post in google-code or somewhere else?

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by elmariachi View Post
            Will you post in google-code or somewhere else?
            I have post it on GoogleCode. Try
            I have also make sure that all are usable on my GoogleCode download page

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by elmariachi View Post
              Will you post in google-code or somewhere else?
              Also I am now doing benchmark to show which(V3-RC3-1, V3-RC3-2) work better.

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by elmariachi View Post
                +1 github is a good option imho

                btw: on subjective use, RIFS is faster than BFS (I've been comparing both for the last three days). stuff like rendering pdf pages are faster and video plays smoother while compiling. I'll have to measure dropped frames to be sure though.

                Chromium slows down sometimes (pseudo-freezes). I don't know if this is beeing caused by the scheduler (is chromium getting RR??) or by flash or by something else.
                RIFS v3 is released.(Not rc anymore)
                Also read linux mailing list as well.

                Comment


                • #78
                  V3 compilation failure

                  Would you please decide whether we need
                  int preempt; <--- in struct task_struct in include/linux/sched.h
                  or if the corresponding sequence in check_timeslice_end in rifs.c
                  if(p->state != TASK_RUNNING)
                  p->prio --;
                  else
                  p->preempt = 0;
                  is correct. I'm no real programmer but I'm giving it a try with the first choice. (Now compiling :-) ) I hope that it's not the wrong choice. :-?

                  Best regards,
                  Diana

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by Diana View Post
                    Would you please decide whether we need
                    int preempt; <--- in struct task_struct in include/linux/sched.h
                    or if the corresponding sequence in check_timeslice_end in rifs.c
                    if(p->state != TASK_RUNNING)
                    p->prio --;
                    else
                    p->preempt = 0;
                    is correct. I'm no real programmer but I'm giving it a try with the first choice. (Now compiling :-) ) I hope that it's not the wrong choice. :-?

                    Best regards,
                    Diana
                    Is it really V3?

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by Diana View Post
                      Would you please decide whether we need
                      int preempt; <--- in struct task_struct in include/linux/sched.h
                      or if the corresponding sequence in check_timeslice_end in rifs.c
                      if(p->state != TASK_RUNNING)
                      p->prio --;
                      else
                      p->preempt = 0;
                      is correct. I'm no real programmer but I'm giving it a try with the first choice. (Now compiling :-) ) I hope that it's not the wrong choice. :-?

                      Best regards,
                      Diana
                      Sorry. It is my fault.(I have post a wrong patch.)
                      Now please wait for a moment , I am packing the correct one.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X