Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Final Linux Benchmarks Of Project Dirndl

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by yogi_berra View Post
    No, its a just stupid license that keeps lawyers employed.
    Winner winner chicken dinner!

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by cb88 View Post
      Its GPLv3 though which eats at some people....
      May I ask how you know it is GPLv3 and not another revision?

      Comment


      • #13
        cause that is what micheal said

        From his twitter account "I'll also say that the license of dirndl is GNU GPLv3." http://twitter.com/#!/MichaelLarabel
        Last edited by cb88; 06-11-2011, 11:44 AM.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by cb88 View Post
          cause that is what micheal said
          The article only says " GNU GPL license" not which revision.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by deanjo View Post
            The article only says " GNU GPL license" not which revision.
            I think on Twitter or elsewhere I mentioned the v3 revision.
            Michael Larabel
            http://www.michaellarabel.com/

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Michael View Post
              I think on Twitter or elsewhere I mentioned the v3 revision.
              OK that explains it, not a twitter user (or follower).

              Comment


              • #17
                I'm not a twitter fan either but yeah.. I updated my post before you replied sorry about that

                Comment


                • #18
                  Well, if it's a compiler/compiler suite I don't see why the licence would matter since it doesn't affect the generated code.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Merely that it pushes away some of the BSD operating systems they are working to completely supplant GCC with PCC or LLVM which are both BSD licensed

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by XorEaxEax View Post
                      Well, if it's a compiler/compiler suite I don't see why the licence would matter since it doesn't affect the generated code.
                      If it is a compiler suite then it may matter if their runtime library is also GPL licensed and they don't have a provision akin to the GCC runtime library exception.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X