Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NTFS-3G Merges With NTFSprogs, Plus New Version
Collapse
X
-
It was a big enough pain in the ass that it caused me to switch back to SuSE way back then and stay with SuSE.
-
Originally posted by RahulSundaram View Post
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by deanjo View PostNot really, that was the days before even Fedora existed and Red Hat wasn't just an enterprise solution.
I wouldn't use EL without it.
Leave a comment:
-
I also don't miss having to manually compile and install alsa support from those days.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by deanjo View PostSame here, oh how I used to hate having to install a stupid extra external module in Redhat just to get even read support of NTFS.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by allquixotic View PostMy, that's quite a mouthful! How about ntfsprogs-3g, or nixtfs (a portmanteau of "NIX" and "ntfs"), or something else a bit shorter? :P
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by phoronixntfs-3g_ntfsprogs-2011.4.12
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d2kx View PostCan't remember when I last thought about NTFS support. For the past years with mainstreams distributions, it just worked (TM).
Leave a comment:
-
You usally see no huge problems with older version when you just access a few files. When you copy several gigabytes of data and compare the speed then you will see definitely differences. I usually try to use current versions of ntfs-3g for Kanotix (definitely newer compared to U/D). This time the packageing seems to be more tricky, best would be if the original maintainer would update it.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: