With all this talk of socio-economic systems, I'm surprised that noone has suggested politics as a major threat to Linux. With all the in-fighting, we always risk fragmentation.
What Would Be Disastrous For Linux, Open-Source
Collapse
X
-
The End of BSOD
I think that would really scary:
Microsoft gets out a Windows 8 that not only works reasonably well and is as customizable/configurable as Linux, but which does not feature the notorious BSOD anymore.
People would barely have any incentive to switch to Linux any longer. Linux newbies usually do not care about Open Source Stuff and its philosophy.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by wirrbeltier View PostThe mere idea that you can trivially make claims to own an idea, not an implementation, is simply out of this age.
Originally posted by wirrbeltier View PostEspecially since the large ones in the industry have started to use it as a normal trick of the trade to keep the smaller competition in check. Once Linux makes enough money for some party, the patent trolls will come to leech off what they percieve as their share.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Remco View PostWith all this talk of socio-economic systems, I'm surprised that noone has suggested politics as a major threat to Linux. With all the in-fighting, we always risk fragmentation.
FOSS lovers can counter this by writing to their elected officials to urge them not to cave in to MS's demands, if this ever came to pass
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Remco View PostWith all this talk of socio-economic systems, I'm surprised that noone has suggested politics as a major threat to Linux. With all the in-fighting, we always risk fragmentation.
But you have a great point, fragmentation (independent from the cause) is a great threat to open source as a whole. In fact, unichrome drivers show an example of how fragmentation can kill a project, and many others that I'm not aware of :P
Comment
-
Comment