If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Will this solve the problem that people have creating installers for all the different distros, for instance Blizzard has cited that fragmentation makes it too costly to port their games to Linux? If it doesn't solve those problems, then was anything truly great really accomplished, except to reduce needed development hours spent on it so it can be spent elsewhere? If it does then that would be truly spectacular.
NO, it simply allows the same douche baggy development packaging to continue that cuased game ports to not come over to linux.
Great project indeed. Just as an information, Mageia was there not Mandriva. It was one of the main goals of Mageia team to develop cross distro collaboration and we hope we will have plenty of others.
I see great potential and exciting possibilities if they widen the scope a bit.
The great thing about a package manager is that you don't have to use only centralized package repositories.
Many things have their own ppa.
It would be awesome if AppStream would contain some api's for packages/software management.
It would make a lot of people's life much easier.
1) setting up ppa's or AppStream's equivalent.
2) That can handle stuff like versions, branching(forks), multiple sources, statistics.
What would really be handy is that there would be something like public statistics.
Statistics literaly available for everybody. It doesn't have to be detailed or mandatory. e.g. number of downloads for a certain time interval. Filterable by OS, distro, package/software version, source, other...
Such statistics would be available by software sources such as AppStream Equivalent of PPA's.
If enough website's would uniformly implement something like this. We could have something to could the total number of downloaded linux distro's or other floss-software somewhat reliably.
This part wouldn't even have to be limited to Linux.
It would need api's for:
updating packages/software via packages and managers
It would also be nice to be able to do the following:
setup AppStream on a server and some computers
be able to set the computers to fetch the software they should install from the server
be able to set a package/software configuration of a bundle of packages you want on the computers. And share that via network. All computers connected would be able to copy, check and add/remove the right packages. While the server uses another configuration for it's own software. It would be handy to make a configuration and include that in another configuration.
Hmm, I don't think this is meant as any sort of replacement to current package maintenance systems, but rather more like an easy interface to them for an end user. I can see it gaining traction in point-and-click adventure desktop experiences, while still letting those who wish use the underlying mechanism (so the gentoo folk might not want to use it, but the ubuntu crowd might like it).
Something to keep an eye on at any rate, and see if it pans out.
I was mildly excited reading this until I read the dreaded word "PackageKit". There's a reason I stay away from PackageKit like the plague and just use yum from cli (actually I'd probably use yum anyway even if PackageKit didn't bring up really bad memories because there are some things I just prefer doing from cli even if there is an excellent GUI). Then again I haven't actually given PackageKit a shot in a really long time so maybe it's not horrible anymore.