Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lightspark 0.4.4.2 Brings Plug-in Based Audio

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • TemplarGR
    replied
    Lightspark certainly seems promising. I do not intend to use it yet, but i am waiting for the 0.5 milestone, and then i will probably switch.

    It is not like it could have more problems than Adobe's implementation anyway...

    Plus i am using Chromium 6 and youtube's html5 beta and is working great!

    Leave a comment:


  • sturmflut
    replied
    Originally posted by r1348 View Post
    I think the only thing separating lightspark from widespread adoption in linux distros is the support for a plugin-based media framework like gstreamer. Directly linking to ffmpeg is in fact an obstacle due to its murky software patent situation. With gstreamer, or any other plugin framework, distros could actually provide only the free codecs by default, leaving the patented stuff to third party repos.
    at least 95% of the users dont't care about the patent situation, or code quality, or anything else, if the software just works most of the time. And since distributions like Ubuntu ship ffmpeg including patent-encumbered codecs, there should not be any reason to ship lightspark as well.

    The two things separating lightsprak from widespread adoption are support for the most "important" Flash applets, read: video sites and 2D games, and support for more platforms.

    Leave a comment:


  • r1348
    replied
    I think the only thing separating lightspark from widespread adoption in linux distros is the support for a plugin-based media framework like gstreamer. Directly linking to ffmpeg is in fact an obstacle due to its murky software patent situation. With gstreamer, or any other plugin framework, distros could actually provide only the free codecs by default, leaving the patented stuff to third party repos.

    Leave a comment:


  • whizse
    replied
    YouPorn? Somebody uploaded pornographic material to the internet? Well, I'm sure it will be removed post-haste.

    Leave a comment:


  • darkbasic
    replied
    Originally posted by sturmflut View Post
    To my great amusement I noticed it supports YouPorn, the development priorities seem to be clear
    It's time to give it a try

    Leave a comment:


  • blackshard
    replied
    Originally posted by DeepDayze View Post
    haha, that could very well be the "gold standard" for the Flash alternatives. If it can play YouPorn then its met the minimum standard
    If is support YouPorn, it is going to be useful

    Leave a comment:


  • DeepDayze
    replied
    Originally posted by sturmflut View Post
    To my great amusement I noticed it supports YouPorn, the development priorities seem to be clear
    haha, that could very well be the "gold standard" for the Flash alternatives. If it can play YouPorn then its met the minimum standard

    Leave a comment:


  • MaestroMaus
    replied
    Originally posted by sturmflut View Post
    To my great amusement I noticed it supports YouPorn, the development priorities seem to be clear
    WIN!

    (word limit, you know how annoying it is)

    Leave a comment:


  • sturmflut
    replied
    Originally posted by cl333r View Post
    Everyone is waiting for the great day when it provides great support for youtube, until then - oh well..
    To my great amusement I noticed it supports YouPorn, the development priorities seem to be clear

    Leave a comment:


  • cl333r
    replied
    Everyone is waiting for the great day when it provides great support for youtube, until then - oh well..

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X