Originally posted by pejakm
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Finally, Reiser4 Benchmarks Against EXT4 & Btrfs
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by MaestroMaus View PostWhahaha, look at all you guys getting totally worked up about filesystems. Linux has major issues in a lot of area's and the filesystem area isn't one of them. Why don't you guys start coding or paying a programmer to do something useful?
Leave a comment:
-
WIki pedia said that Raiser is faster on 4k files, so for the net browsing should be good than.
I get about 3% faster with Chrome web pages read out.
Leave a comment:
-
Whahaha, look at all you guys getting totally worked up about filesystems. Linux has major issues in a lot of area's and the filesystem area isn't one of them. Why don't you guys start coding or paying a programmer to do something useful?
Leave a comment:
-
Hi,
It would have really been nice if you'd also included XFS and JFS in the test. Personally I am a big fan of XFS as an allrounder.
Especially from XFS I'd expect a well balanced performance in those tests. Prove me wrong!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by energyman View PostHow can you even can come up with the ida that extracting patches from a very experimental and very untested kernel is a good idea?
I'm not very skilled with git, but I'll try to extract reiser4 patches and then compare it with Edwards (found here: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kerne...eiser4-for-2.6). It would be interesting to see the differences, don't you think so?
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: