exFAT Driver With Linux 6.13 Reduces FAT Chain Traversal For Better Performance

[kurkosdr]

Think my replies already iterated this angle.

Your replies seem to be looking for an argument where there is none.

Your argument is that exFAT will be deprecated before April 2028, I am telling you this isn't possible, in the same way that MP3 or FAT32 (which is used in the MicroSDHC standard) cannot be deprecated.

Your other argument was that I am "relying upon Microsoft as my savoir" when I have made it clear I am using exFAT for compatibility reasons.

[rogerx]

Your argument is that exFAT will be deprecated before April 2028, I am telling you this isn't possible, in the same way that MP3 or FAT32 (which is used in the MicroSDHC standard) cannot be deprecated.

Your other argument was that I am "relying upon Microsoft as my savoir" when I have made it clear I am using exFAT for compatibility reasons.

Shrugs... might want to re-read my initial post then.


I'll save you the hassle for searching the history, but here's that one post for your re-reading, and then compare with your mangled miss-quote above:


"And just before 2028, I'm sure MS will (supposedly) invent exFAT2, having a patent end date of 2038 and exFAT being suddenly deprecated. Of course, this is just all guess work and speculation."


Where does one see an argument here, aside from dragging speculation into a court room?

[kurkosdr]

Shrugs... might want to re-read my initial post then.

I'll save you the hassle for searching the history, but here's that one post for your re-reading, and then compare with your mangled miss-quote above:

"And just before 2028, I'm sure MS will (supposedly) invent exFAT2, having a patent end date of 2038 and exFAT being suddenly deprecated. Of course, this is just all guess work and speculation."

Where does one see an argument here, aside from dragging speculation into a court room?

Your implicit argument is that your guesswork and speculation are worthy of consideration, despite the fact they contradict facts. Newsflash: They are not worthy of consideration because they facts.

When someone points out to you the facts that your guesswork and speculation contradict, it's better to just accept you were wrong and move on. But you had to double down on the nonsense with the following arguments:

Good luck with your ventures with relying upon Microsoft as your savoir..

As for myself, I'll continue expecting everything being deprecated by Microsoft.

Which btw do look like explicit arguments for sure.

Seriously, nobody forces you to keep posting.

[rogerx]

Your implicit argument is that your guesswork and speculation are worthy of consideration, despite the fact they contradict facts. Newsflash: They are not worthy of consideration because they facts.

When someone points out to you the facts that your guesswork and speculation contradict, it's better to just accept you were wrong and move on. But you had to double down on the nonsense with the following arguments:



Which btw do look like explicit arguments for sure.

Seriously, nobody forces you to keep posting.

You're still arguing over nothing. :-)