Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Linux 6.11-rc4 Released: "Nothing Feels All That Odd"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Linux 6.11-rc4 Released: "Nothing Feels All That Odd"

    Phoronix: Linux 6.11-rc4 Released: "Nothing Feels All That Odd"

    The fourth weekly release candidate of Linux 6.11 is now available for testing...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Just another day at the office. Managing thousands of commits from houndreds of contributors. Not really much.

    Comment


    • #3
      It's amazing when bcachefs intorduces new on disk format versions and accounting rewrites in middle of RC period and still manages to be astonishingly solid. I guess such could not be possible or allowed unless it was marked experimental.

      Comment


      • #4
        I'm looking forward to the arrival of the driver for rtl8812au.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by varikonniemi View Post
          It's amazing when bcachefs intorduces new on disk format versions and accounting rewrites in middle of RC period and still manages to be astonishingly solid. I guess such could not be possible or allowed unless it was marked experimental.
          installed bcachefs immediately on an NVMe, and an SSD, both more or less sharing the same workload, but I didnt pair them since my SSD is super old now, and gotta say, it's been great, perf has been solid, and well, already proven to be more reliable for me the btrfs

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Quackdoc View Post

            installed bcachefs immediately on an NVMe, and an SSD, both more or less sharing the same workload, but I didnt pair them since my SSD is super old now, and gotta say, it's been great, perf has been solid, and well, already proven to be more reliable for me the btrfs
            Still waiting for them to implement subvolume mounting. But I'm interested in testing it after that.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by shmerl View Post

              Still waiting for them to implement subvolume mounting. But I'm interested in testing it after that.
              what is your use case that cannot be achieved by bind mount or bindfs?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by varikonniemi View Post

                what is your use case that cannot be achieved by bind mount or bindfs?
                multiple distros/system snapshots on a single FS, selected by subvol=$distro_name on the kernel command line.
                Last edited by Serafean; 19 August 2024, 06:28 AM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by varikonniemi View Post

                  what is your use case that cannot be achieved by bind mount or bindfs?
                  Cleaner mounting without other directories lingering around.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by ihatemichael
                    Btrfs got all of those things, sure it's been around longer but if bcachefs is going to take over btrfs they better implement those things at some point.
                    Yes, exactly. It has to at least match comfort points of btrfs to be able to start appealing due to what is better in it.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X