Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Linux 6.6 Formally Becomes This Year's LTS Kernel

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Linux 6.6 Formally Becomes This Year's LTS Kernel

    Phoronix: Linux 6.6 Formally Becomes This Year's LTS Kernel

    As was expected but now made official: this year's Long-Term Support (LTS) kernel is Linux 6.6...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Someone's going to be disappointed.

    Comment


    • #3
      There were quite a few systems that could not be upgraded from 4.9 to 4.14 this past year. When 4.14 and 4.19 reach EOL, expect that a much larger number of systems are going to fail to work properly with newer kernels.

      While it's good that newer machines are more energy efficient, the obverse is true about decisions like this increasing the rate of e-waste accumulation. Computers should be made to last much longer and to use fewer toxic and rare earth metal components. Constantly chasing Moore's Law speed increases at all costs is not without longterm harm for the environment and mankind.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by dlq84 View Post
        Someone's going to be disappointed.
        There will always be features someone wishes had made it into the next LTS kernel.

        Those people should have worked harder to actively contribute to move the feature they wanted into an earlier kernel.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by andyprough View Post
          There were quite a few systems that could not be upgraded from 4.9 to 4.14 this past year. When 4.14 and 4.19 reach EOL, expect that a much larger number of systems are going to fail to work properly with newer kernels.

          While it's good that newer machines are more energy efficient, the obverse is true about decisions like this increasing the rate of e-waste accumulation. Computers should be made to last much longer and to use fewer toxic and rare earth metal components. Constantly chasing Moore's Law speed increases at all costs is not without longterm harm for the environment and mankind.
          So the choice is either new kernel or trash can? Why?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by dlq84 View Post
            Someone's going to be disappointed.
            Me 😂😂😂

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Franco Castillo View Post

              Me 😂😂😂
              Better luck next year

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by dlq84 View Post
                Someone's going to be disappointed.
                For Ubuntu 24.04 LTS the Kernel 6.7 would be better, since its closer to their release date.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Malsabku View Post

                  For Ubuntu 24.04 LTS the Kernel 6.7 would be better, since its closer to their release date.
                  Canonical is free to choose whatever kernel version they want for their Ubuntu LTS releases (just like RedHat does with their EL releases). If you want/need 6.7, contact your TAM (or DSE) and ask Canonical to consider it.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    The first LTS kernel where TIOCSTI can be disabled

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X