Btrfs Deprecating Its Integrity Checker Tool

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • cynic
    replied
    Originally posted by GreenReaper View Post

    100% of Btrfs users are actively debugging Btrfs code.</s>
    we're actively debugging the whole HW and SW stack TBF.


    Leave a comment:


  • GreenReaper
    replied
    Originally posted by intelfx View Post
    You are not supposed to use it if you are not actively debugging Btrfs code.​
    100% of Btrfs users are actively debugging Btrfs code.</s>

    ​​​​​​(Honestly, I agree; a regular scrub is enough of a precaution. Heck, you can have it run just in the quietest two hours and pause it after that for resuming the day after.)

    Leave a comment:


  • Ananace
    replied
    Originally posted by elbar View Post
    Has Btrfs some foundation to preserve and gain market traction and maybe some adoption among those who could like it and maybe make some progress?
    Well, it's the default filesystem for both Fedora and SUSE, it's heavily used at Meta (it's been mentioned as being the exclusive filesystem for their server fleet), it's the root filesystem in every Steam Deck, it's used by distributions like ChimeraOS to distribute new immutable root images, etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • intelfx
    replied

    Originally posted by NotMine999 View Post
    Btrfs users don't need an integrity checker much like they don't a reliable RAID 5/6 solution based on Btrfs.

    Originally posted by EphemeralEft View Post
    Usually I'd agree with this sentiment, but DM-Integrity is unusably slow. I'd love if BTRFS's algorithm replaced it, though.
    100% of comments here are misguided attempts at starting a flame war.

    Btrfs' integrity checker is nothing more than an internal debugging tool (that has outlived its usefulness). You are not supposed to use it if you are not actively debugging Btrfs code.​

    Leave a comment:


  • vladpetric
    replied
    Originally posted by NotMine999 View Post
    Btrfs users don't need an integrity checker much like they don't a reliable RAID 5/6 solution based on Btrfs.
    That's another definition for impossibility (reliable RAID5/6 in Btrfs, given its architecture and the write hole).

    Leave a comment:


  • EphemeralEft
    replied
    Originally posted by NotMine999 View Post
    Btrfs users don't need an integrity checker much like they don't a reliable RAID 5/6 solution based on Btrfs.
    Usually I'd agree with this sentiment, but DM-Integrity is unusably slow. I'd love if BTRFS's algorithm replaced it, though.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotMine999
    replied
    Btrfs users don't need an integrity checker much like they don't a reliable RAID 5/6 solution based on Btrfs.

    Leave a comment:


  • fong38
    replied
    Originally posted by ferry View Post

    The whole of Linux is a maintenance burden. Oh wait, some people call that their job.
    Life itself is a maintenance burden, it's time to unalive ourselves.

    Leave a comment:


  • ferry
    replied
    Originally posted by Weasel View Post
    I think btrfs is a maintenance burden too, let's remove it.
    The whole of Linux is a maintenance burden. Oh wait, some people call that their job.

    Leave a comment:


  • anarki2
    replied
    :'D sums up the story of Btrfs pretty well.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X