Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Picolibc 1.7.9 Adds Support For More CPU Targets

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Picolibc 1.7.9 Adds Support For More CPU Targets

    Phoronix: Picolibc 1.7.9 Adds Support For More CPU Targets

    Longtime open-source developer Keith Packard has announced the release of Picolibc 1.7.9, the newest version of his C library for embedded systems. Picolibc 1.7.9 adds support for several new CPU architectures and other enhancements for his miniature libc implementation...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Can someone switch glibc for picolibc on Linux systems? This may be useful for embedded Linux systems

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by jorgepl View Post
      Can someone switch glibc for picolibc on Linux systems? This may be useful for embedded Linux systems
      Can you think of a case where you can run the Linux kernel but can't use one of the other embedded libc implementations? I mean musl, uClibc, or any other. I think this is more intended to bare metal, but maybe I'm wrong.

      Comment


      • #4
        Hmm... Picolibc doesn't support Pico yet.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by kneekoo View Post
          Hmm... Picolibc doesn't support Pico yet.
          Are you sure about that? The Pico is an ARM Cortex-M0+ and Picolibc supports ARM processors.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Veto View Post

            Are you sure about that? The Pico is an ARM Cortex-M0+ and Picolibc supports ARM processors.
            Nope, I'm not sure. But why you would mention "Cortex-M0+" if it simply supports all ARM CPUs?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by kneekoo View Post

              Nope, I'm not sure. But why you would mention "Cortex-M0+" if it simply supports all ARM CPUs?
              I think the better question is: Are you seriously interested in the answer or was it just a lame joke?

              Comment


              • #8
                Not a joke. It seemed like redundant information if all ARM CPUs are supported.

                Comment

                Working...
                X