Originally posted by karolherbst
View Post
The thing is, and you're just like them, a lot of people hate it, and I don't mean just programmers, or people who want quality code, but even users. They're sick of it and you're oblivious to it, this is why the software ecosystem is such utter crap nowadays. Having 100 different spins of the same type of app is not a "good thing", THEY ALL SUCK.
But I mean it makes even more sense now: notice pattern of Rust programmers to rewrite stuff that's already working good? I mean that's what "getting shit done" means in their eyes just like JS "devs": NIH and re-implementing the same shit with even more bloat, using a million frameworks for the simplest of things, because that's all they know how to code. Instead of seeking perfection in one software that has one purpose let's rewrite it so now we have 100 turds instead of one singular app that has no redundant bullshit. But hey you "got shit done" congrats.
Next time don't even dare to argue against people who talk about software quality if your argument is the typical "getting shit done". It's just an insult to anyone who knows what software quality is. Just like it's an insult to claim Python is much better than C in terms of software quality because "it gets shit done a lot faster". Well if what you wrote was true quality you wouldn't need to "get it done" 100 different times, just once.
Comment