Experimental "UBD" Driver Posted As IO_uring-Based User-Space Block Driver

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • yump
    replied
    So this is a higher-performance replacement for nbd?

    Leave a comment:


  • rafanelli
    replied
    thanks you both. i had exactly the same question.

    Leave a comment:


  • NobodyXu
    replied
    Originally posted by uid313 View Post
    How is this different from FUSE?
    Is this the same thing as FUSE?
    Maybe FUSE could use IO_uring.
    FUSE is filesystem in userspace.

    UBD is userspace block driver.

    They operate on different level here.

    FUSE could use io-uring, in fact, there's something called fuseuring https://github.com/uroni/fuseuring that demonstrates use of io-uring with FUSE.

    Leave a comment:


  • uid313
    replied
    How is this different from FUSE?
    Is this the same thing as FUSE?
    Maybe FUSE could use IO_uring.

    Leave a comment:


  • Experimental "UBD" Driver Posted As IO_uring-Based User-Space Block Driver

    Phoronix: Experimental "UBD" Driver Posted As IO_uring-Based User-Space Block Driver

    Ming Lei of Red Hat has published an early implementation of a IO_uring based user-space block driver for Linux...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
Working...
X