Originally posted by andrei_me
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Lennart Talks Up The Power Of systemd-sysext For Testing /usr Changes
Collapse
X
-
-
While the idea itself is not actually that bad, I fear it may create more complex configuration options than it potentially solves. When someone suddenly depends on an extension being enabled for something it may be a way of painting yourself in. The idea is ok , but will people use it sane or will it become a mess?!
http://www.dirtcellar.net
Comment
-
Originally posted by evert_mouw View Post
I've created a few systemd unit files and yes I like it, but no systemd is not THE standard, and also goes contrary to the UNIX philosophy at times.
I don't really like systemd 100%, but I get tired of religious adherences to "The Way" as if it's the only True Way of doing things.
- Likes 6
Comment
-
Originally posted by sinepgib View Post
I didn't get it, how do you mean?
2. Mount it using systemd-sysext
3. Hope that the system uses the file-system cache (and doesn't read from disk), therefore massively boosting load times
Should be faster than ureadahead as we preload one big file (sequential) instead of many small files (random)...
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by stormcrow View Post
I'd argue that a philosophy born from a time in which 64k of RAM was worth a year's salary and CPUs couldn't multitask needs to be buried. Computers have moved on, but some of the antiquated philosophies from the Early Days haven't. There's very little software these days that adhere to "the Unix philosophy" and that's only natural. Software philosophy has moved on as new hardware capabilities and orders of magnitudes of available resources have allowed new concepts that places a lot of single tasking software in the obsolescence bucket.
I don't really like systemd 100%, but I get tired of religious adherences to "The Way" as if it's the only True Way of doing things.
- Likes 6
Comment
-
Originally posted by stormcrow View Post
I'd argue that a philosophy born from a time in which 64k of RAM was worth a year's salary and CPUs couldn't multitask needs to be buried. Computers have moved on, but some of the antiquated philosophies from the Early Days haven't. There's very little software these days that adhere to "the Unix philosophy" and that's only natural. Software philosophy has moved on as new hardware capabilities and orders of magnitudes of available resources have allowed new concepts that places a lot of single tasking software in the obsolescence bucket.
I don't really like systemd 100%, but I get tired of religious adherences to "The Way" as if it's the only True Way of doing things.
As with anything, in reality it has its own pros and cons and you have to deal with trade offs and different priorities that are context dependent, etc.
- Likes 3
Comment
Comment