Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Linux 5.17: Quicker Mount Times For XFS, Few New Features For EXT4

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DanL
    replied
    Originally posted by mirmirmir View Post
    (Gibberish)
    Hey, I think I found 144Hz's new account

    Leave a comment:


  • mirmirmir
    replied
    Originally posted by DanL View Post

    WTF are you talking about? This is an article about the kernel, specifically filesystems.
    I can read gnome article earlier than this one from twitter link. But there's no forum section for gnome article by that time. And gnome article only have forum a while after this article came out, so i can't FUD earlier. That's why I'm here.

    Leave a comment:


  • tildearrow
    replied
    No thumbnail? Here's one:

    MSvDEUOCIa.png

    Don't take seriously

    Leave a comment:


  • Mario Junior
    replied
    Originally posted by HD7950 View Post
    XFS & EXT4 are the only file-systems I would recommend.
    For me, is Btrfs in everywhere. hehehe

    Leave a comment:


  • uxmkt
    replied
    Originally posted by Vistaus View Post
    How fast are we talking about? I recently switched to XFS (on my new PC) for the first time ever and it's already much, much faster compared to EXT4. In fact, it's almost *too* fast. So am I even going to notice the difference when 5.17 lands?
    Without CoW extents, would you even notice a change in the processing speed of such extents...

    Leave a comment:


  • DanL
    replied
    Originally posted by mirmirmir View Post
    Looks like articles about gnome are held back. Why is that?
    WTF are you talking about? This is an article about the kernel, specifically filesystems.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vistaus
    replied
    How fast are we talking about? I recently switched to XFS (on my new PC) for the first time ever and it's already much, much faster compared to EXT4. In fact, it's almost *too* fast. So am I even going to notice the difference when 5.17 lands?

    Leave a comment:


  • skeevy420
    replied
    Originally posted by HD7950 View Post
    XFS & EXT4 are the only file-systems I would recommend.
    For me it's Ext4, F2FS, and ZFS; or simple stuff, specific media, advanced stuff. For simple stuff, XFS and Ext4 are basically tied in my mind.

    Well, I'd suggest and use Reiser4/5 for simple stuff if it had better support; was in-kernel. Michael, I don't know if you are aware of this, but the ass-end of the Wikipedia page for Reiser4 is them writing about your assumptions.

    Leave a comment:


  • RejectModernity
    replied
    Originally posted by HD7950 View Post
    XFS & EXT4 are the only file-systems I would recommend.
    Nah, I'm cool with my f2fs on my SSDs.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nocifer
    replied
    Originally posted by mirmirmir View Post
    Looks like articles about gnome are held back. Why is that?
    Obviously it is a conspiracy against GNOME, Phoronix is a well-known KDE shill after all.

    /s

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X