Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Alibaba Proposes A Group Balancer For The Linux Kernel Scheduler

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Alibaba Proposes A Group Balancer For The Linux Kernel Scheduler

    Phoronix: Alibaba Proposes A Group Balancer For The Linux Kernel Scheduler

    With more organizations such as Alibaba configuring their servers to share CPU cores/resources among applications these days rather than exclusively assigning CPU cores to individual applications/tasks, the Chinese company is proposing a new "group balancer" for the Linux kernel scheduler...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Couldn't this be implemented with standard cgroups?

    Comment


    • #3
      this is interesting I suppose, I wonder what will come of it.

      Comment


      • #4
        Time to alert the sinophobes. The proposer is an agent of the CCP. They want their NSA to get into world's favourite operating systems for servers. Alert. Alert. As usual. The sky is falling.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by gregzeng View Post
          Time to alert the sinophobes. The proposer is an agent of the CCP. They want their NSA to get into world's favourite operating systems for servers. Alert. Alert. As usual. The sky is falling.
          Did you shitpost in here because you're lonely?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Ironmask View Post

            Did you shitpost in here because you're lonely?
            If theres anyplace likely to succeed its here.

            Comment


            • #7
              On the first week of the new year, we need some levity. Many of us are stuck at home due to the corona viruses. So, Happy New Year to all and thanks gregzeng for the chuckle.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by lucrus View Post
                Couldn't this be implemented with standard cgroups?
                opening letter contains answer to your question

                Comment

                Working...
                X