Originally posted by microcode
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Systemd Blasts Ahead With A Record Number Of Commits In 2021
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by geearf View PostCan I use that Flatpak isolation with apps from my distribution's repo or does it need to be all from Flatpak?
How is Flatpak superior?
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by skeevy420 View PostLast time I tried Flatpak, almost a year ago, it sandboxed stuff so well that I couldn't get my printer or controllers working. That may or may not be better. I don't feel like finding out.
Comment
-
-
Soon, SystemD will become a fully fleshed out, independent Linux userspace. Can't wait for "SystemD Office" or a SystemD webbrowser that only renders websites which solely use CC-licensed assets correctly…
Jokes aside, I really like that it unified all sorts of system related configuration stuff and created a universal standard across distros - maintenance has become so much easier and stuff like Yubikey support for disk encryption and portable home directories are some pretty nice goodies aswell.
- Likes 6
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shiba View Post
And that's exactly why I avoid flatpak whenever I can. I have a distro, I don't need also the crappy upstream runtime.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by geearf View PostCan I use that Flatpak isolation with apps from my distribution's repo or does it need to be all from Flatpak?
How is Flatpak superior?
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by treba View Post
Flatpak is not Flathub. A distro can simply have a Flatpak repo, just as it has rpm/dep/... repos. That's e.g. how Fedora Silverblue works. Flathub is just a cross-distribution repo and the Flatpak technology is independent from it.
Is the repo technology itself interesting compared to other repos?
Comment
Comment