Originally posted by M@GOid
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Linux 5.14 SSD Benchmarks With Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. F2FS vs. XFS
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by intelfx View PostMaybe, but these mechanisms don't integrate with self-healing features of checksumming filesystems.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by zoner View PostI think that this discussion is missing some important variables that directly impact such as the speed of booting and the speed of loading various applications. Some of those variables are:
1. The age of the computer being tested
2. The age and quality of the motherboard
3. The speed of the hdd or ssd and how such drives differ
and here comes a big on:
4. What distro a user is using and all of tweaks and changes inherent to any distro
5. What are all twinks and changes that a user may implement
6. Because each of us has their own thing going on in their brain, we each have a different sense of speed
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by S.Pam View PostYou mean people that value data integrity?
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by flower View Post
many hdds and ssds use crc32 internally to verify data. as btrfs uses crc32 too its pretty useless.
and there is still integritysetup - if you use an external drive for integrity it doesnt have ANY performance penality. i am using this in an raid10 setup for quite a while (checksum is sha256)
- Likes 7
Comment
Comment