Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Linux Developers Discuss A Global Counter For Block/Disk Changes

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by jacob View Post

    Both have contributed to Linux far more than you ever did, so that's that.
    And for that reason their names will be carved into the Linux history for ever!

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Danielsan View Post

      And for that reason their names will be carved into the Linux history for ever!
      Of course they will, just like every other contributor. Just because you feel an irrational hate towards them doesn't mean the world at large has a duty to ostracise them.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by jacob View Post
        Of course they will, just like every other contributor.
        Nope, they will have a better recognition more than the others not matter what.

        Just because you feel an irrational hate towards them doesn't mean the world at large has a duty to ostracise them.
        Let us say all together a great farewell to the sarcasm...
        Last edited by Danielsan; 27 June 2021, 10:41 PM.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by M@GOid View Post

          I totally agreed with any single one of those.
          Then you are not very consistent. I read all, and several pairs are clear contractions.

          Comment


          • #15
            What about the performance impact of performing an atomic operation on the same global variable for every disk operation? Wouldn't this increase latency due to synchronization between cpus?

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by thegodland View Post
              What about the performance impact of performing an atomic operation on the same global variable for every disk operation? Wouldn't this increase latency due to synchronization between cpus?
              I think the counter is used only when new disk is inserted instead of for every IO.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by ALRBP View Post

                Then you are not very consistent. I read all, and several pairs are clear contractions.
                It was a joke :-)

                Comment


                • #18
                  Hi there,

                  I've been contributing to the Linux kernel since 2005 while working in Canonical and Red Hat.
                  And I'll keep doing it now that I work for Microsoft, get over it

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by ALRBP View Post

                    Then you are not very consistent. I read all, and several pairs are clear contractions.
                    That was the point. A little bit of something for everyone

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Danielsan View Post

                      And for that reason their names will be carved into the Linux history for ever!
                      We need a Linux Walk of Fame

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X