Originally posted by kpedersen
View Post
Software with DRM holds absolutely no value for me. Actually, people couldn't pay me to have this kind of stuff installed because I find it an insult. However not everyone feels this way or cares quite enough (and admittedly for something that isn't life critical I do see this point). So I guess I am "lucky" in that not having access to this is certainly not a blocker for me.
I think my main annoyance with this stuff is that without it, sure we would have less games overall. But what we would have would be cleaner and less creepy. And in the long run due to the way DRM works we are actually going to end up with less games (20-30 years in the future). As a big DOS gaming fan, this would have been tragic if online DRM was around back then.
I think my main annoyance with this stuff is that without it, sure we would have less games overall. But what we would have would be cleaner and less creepy. And in the long run due to the way DRM works we are actually going to end up with less games (20-30 years in the future). As a big DOS gaming fan, this would have been tragic if online DRM was around back then.
It's also why I'm really watching Oracle Vs Google. If Google loses then most all emulators, VMs, Wine, DRM workarounds, etc can potentially be made illegal since you have to copy the APIs to emulate the software being ran. It's a scary thought and at least a few Supreme Court Justices get that. I'm glad Justice Stephen Breyer has that QWERTY keyboard analogy. Then there's the asshat Justice Brett Kavanaugh saying "well nothing bad has happened yet". Because they're waiting on y'all to rule one way or the other. Geez. How can someone making that dumb of a statement be a Supreme Court Justice?
Comment