Originally posted by cjcox
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Red Hat's Stratis 2.2 Linux Storage Solution Released
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by mortn View PostWant a distributed, extensively configurable, self-healing, copy-on-write storage system? Use Ceph. Been managing both large scale clusters and single node setups for years. Can recommend.
Comment
-
My point is exactly that Ceph is just as much a storage solution as btrfs, stratis or zfs.
It’s not like Ceph(FS) is so overly complex that we can't bring it up here or you need a degree to set it up. It's not a different animal. It's another animal.
We don't need to agree whether Ceph is in or out of context here though.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pal666 View Postas anyone with brains knows they want a red hat "supportable" solution. when you don't have btrfs devs, but you have python devs, all you can support is subj
You may not like it, but somehow I doubt that RedHat, with its 3.5B USD revenue , will care...oVirt-HV1: Intel S2600C0, 2xE5-2658V2, 128GB, 8x2TB, 4x480GB SSD, GTX1080 (to-VM), Dell U3219Q, U2415, U2412M.
oVirt-HV2: Intel S2400GP2, 2xE5-2448L, 120GB, 8x2TB, 4x480GB SSD, GTX730 (to-VM).
oVirt-HV3: Gigabyte B85M-HD3, E3-1245V3, 32GB, 4x1TB, 2x480GB SSD, GTX980 (to-VM).
Devel-2: Asus H110M-K, i5-6500, 16GB, 3x1TB + 128GB-SSD, F33.
Comment
-
Originally posted by gilboa View PostAlternatively, brfs has been in development for God knows how many years and have yet to mature to anything resembles enterprise quality FS
Originally posted by gilboa View Post(let alone a managed storage solution), and RedHat being the biggest enterprise focused Linux distribution has decided to take existing enterprise quality building blocks, such as XFS and LVM, and use them to develop an advance storage solution.
Originally posted by gilboa View PostYou may not like it, but somehow I doubt that RedHat, with its 3.5B USD revenue , will care...Last edited by pal666; 13 October 2020, 11:55 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pal666 View Postyes, alternatively. as in "in alternative universe". in our universe it's default fs for suse enterprise distro. stratis is in development for more than 4 years already, btw. 4 years ago btrfs was just 8 years old. you don't have to be a god to know that
Does any of this makes BTRFS, as a storage solution, stable?
Does any of this makes RedHat decision less viable _to_ RedHat customers?
redhat as the only enterprise focused linux distro not employing btrfs devs has decided to use available python programmers to write some scripts on top of their legacy tech
2. I would imagine that if RedHat wanted BTFS developers in house, they'd have a team up and running in 90 days. Possibly less. Do assume that RedHat is not stupid (as you seem to suggest) and simply has other considerations you either don't understand or don't want to understand.
- GilboaoVirt-HV1: Intel S2600C0, 2xE5-2658V2, 128GB, 8x2TB, 4x480GB SSD, GTX1080 (to-VM), Dell U3219Q, U2415, U2412M.
oVirt-HV2: Intel S2400GP2, 2xE5-2448L, 120GB, 8x2TB, 4x480GB SSD, GTX730 (to-VM).
oVirt-HV3: Gigabyte B85M-HD3, E3-1245V3, 32GB, 4x1TB, 2x480GB SSD, GTX980 (to-VM).
Devel-2: Asus H110M-K, i5-6500, 16GB, 3x1TB + 128GB-SSD, F33.
Comment
Comment