Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Red Hat's Stratis 2.2 Linux Storage Solution Released

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Red Hat's Stratis 2.2 Linux Storage Solution Released

    Phoronix: Red Hat's Stratis 2.2 Linux Storage Solution Released

    A new version of Stratis is ready to go as Red Hat's open-source storage solution built atop LVM and XFS for offering easy and modern local storage management on Linux systems that aim to rival the likes of Btrfs and ZFS but without having to rely on a new file-system...

    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...px=Stratis-2.2

  • #2
    Well I could imagine PNN (Phoronix news network) doing a benchmark with stratis vs zfs vs btrfs .

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by onlyLinuxLuvUBack View Post
      Well I could imagine PNN (Phoronix news network) doing a benchmark with stratis vs zfs vs btrfs .
      That would only make sense if the various RAID levels are being compared. But stratis is not supporting RAID yet.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by mbod View Post

        That would only make sense if the various RAID levels are being compared. But stratis is not supporting RAID yet.
        Yes. See https://github.com/stratis-storage/s...docs/issues/54

        Comment


        • #5
          I'm not sure what they actually try to solve with Stratis. It seems like just another layer for existing but separate developed functionalities.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by R41N3R View Post
            I'm not sure what they actually try to solve with Stratis. It seems like just another layer for existing but separate developed functionalities.
            Redhat wants an alternative for btrfs.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by mbod View Post

              Redhat wants an alternative for btrfs.
              So the only reason is an alternative :-)

              As a btrfs user, I hoped that they might somehow integrate distributed filesystem features (like glusterfs) because setting this up correctly requires some tinkering.

              Comment


              • #8
                Anyone who's anyone that follows anything that Red Hat does know why they want a Red Hat "owned" solution. Is this really a surprise to anyone?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Want a distributed, extensively configurable, self-healing, copy-on-write storage system? Use Ceph. Been managing both large scale clusters and single node setups for years. Can recommend.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by onlyLinuxLuvUBack View Post
                    Well I could imagine PNN (Phoronix news network) doing a benchmark with stratis vs zfs vs btrfs .
                    i suggest starting from filesystem resize benchmark

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X