Originally posted by dev_null
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Btrfs Seeing Some Nice Performance Improvements For Linux 5.9
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by cynical View PostThis makes me wonder whether I should use ZFS or Btrfs for my next Ubuntu install. I’m leaning towards ZFS because the official support is likely to be stronger.
- Likes 5
Comment
-
Originally posted by pal666 View Postsome people are smart enough to not use postgres on cow fs. less smart ones look for bogus benchmarks
I would not use Postgresql on btrfs right now (something I've said before as well, in these forums), but that can still change if it gets its act together.
Don't worry, I'm far more accomplished than you are.
Comment
-
MariaDB/InnoDB can be tuned nicely to run on COW filesystems.
Code:innodb-doublewrite = 0 innodb_flush_method = O_DSYNC
https://mariadb.com/kb/en/innodb-sys...lush_neighbors
Especially the following if you run on SSD:
https://mariadb.com/kb/en/innodb-sys...db_io_capacity
https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.7/en/innodb-configuring-io-capacity.htmlLast edited by S.Pam; 05 August 2020, 12:34 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pal666 View Postnothing you listed requires it to be subvolume-specific. i.e. if you could put parity for whole fs on separate drives, it would work just as well(because all good things about subvolumes stem from single fact that they are not tied to partitions. as soon as you tie them, you don't need them)
http://www.dirtcellar.net
Comment
Comment