Hot data tracking/balancing is already considered
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Btrfs Seeing Some Nice Performance Improvements For Linux 5.9
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostWhat distro? Ubuntu is known for btrfs horror stories. I've been following btrfs mailing list and a lot of the people asking for help are from some random Ubuntu LTS using older kernels.
In other distros like OpenSUSE where btrfs is default filesystem it doesn't blow up like that. Now also on Fedora will become first-class citizen.## VGA ##
AMD: X1950XTX, HD3870, HD5870
Intel: GMA45, HD3000 (Core i5 2500K)
Comment
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostWhat distro? Ubuntu is known for btrfs horror stories. I've been following btrfs mailing list and a lot of the people asking for help are from some random Ubuntu LTS using older kernels.
In other distros like OpenSUSE where btrfs is default filesystem it doesn't blow up like that. Now also on Fedora will become first-class citizen.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by waxhead View PostRight now there is not much of a difference, but in the long run this could allow for parity based raid where the stripes are on fast groups of disks and the parity on slower devices. And a disk failure could use a different group as spare space or redundant space. It works also make it easier to isolate metadata on its own controller for example. Plus migrationomigration data would not be across filesystems. It all boils down to flexibility.Last edited by pal666; 04 August 2020, 07:47 PM.
Comment
-
Comment