ext4 being slow is not a regression, it's a systemic issue that was already known in 2012, cf. https://youtu.be/FegjLbCnoBw?t=1242
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
XFS / EXT4 / Btrfs / F2FS / NILFS2 Performance On Linux 5.8
Collapse
X
-
-
Glade to see BTRFS performance is good enough when compared with EXT4. I'm using BTRFS on every desktop and rpi 4 right now, for it's snapshot and subvol features, really useful and addictive indeed; one can install various distros or even mix PC/Rpi distros on same disk/partition via different BTRFS subvols.Last edited by antonyshen; 05 July 2020, 02:12 AM.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by lyamc View PostIt's nice to see just how amazing XFS still is compared to more 'modern' file systems
Anyway, nothing much has changed since the 1980s in computer science. If it was good then, it's still good now.
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Originally posted by pmorph View PostYet another *facepalm* for my decision to move all drives from XFS to EXT4, back when I got my first SSD.
I think I'll just do XFS in the future, see how it goes.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Michael View Post
Current OpenZFS in Ubuntu doesn't support Linux 5.8 kernel, looks like some compat patches were added to OpenZFS Git just a few weeks ago. Plus this was a comparison of mainline file-systems with a focus on Btrfs.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment