EXT4 Gets A Nice Batch Of Fixes For Linux 5.8

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • phoronix
    Administrator
    • Jan 2007
    • 67139

    EXT4 Gets A Nice Batch Of Fixes For Linux 5.8

    Phoronix: EXT4 Gets A Nice Batch Of Fixes For Linux 5.8

    Ted Ts'o sent in the EXT4 file-system changes on Thursday for Linux 5.8 as the summer 2020 kernel release...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
  • Old Grouch
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2020
    • 673

    #2
    There is also clean-ups to EXT4's fiemap handling, multiple block allocator, and other improvements.
    is --> are (English is full of traps for unwary foreigners, so this is not criticism, just information. Irregular verbs are a pain in all languages)

    I guess the fee-, foe-, and fum-map handling didn't need clean-up. ;-)

    Comment

    • elatllat
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2019
      • 571

      #3
      There are words, and there is a letter, but there also be words, and there be a letter...

      Comment

      • timofonic
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 2684

        #4
        Let's make EXT5 with all the features of ZFS and BTRFS. After all, it's the most successful Linux filesystem.

        Comment

        • pranav
          Phoronix Member
          • Nov 2019
          • 80

          #5
          Originally posted by timofonic View Post
          Let's make EXT5 with all the features of ZFS and BTRFS. After all, it's the most successful Linux filesystem.
          It's gonna take a LONG time if they began to think like those filesystems u mentioned and after they decide, its gonna take another LONG time ready to be released in EXT6.

          Although I would love to see that happens faster.

          Comment

          • Vistaus
            Senior Member
            • Jul 2013
            • 5104

            #6
            Originally posted by Old Grouch View Post

            is --> are (English is full of traps for unwary foreigners, so this is not criticism, just information. Irregular verbs are a pain in all languages)

            I guess the fee-, foe-, and fum-map handling didn't need clean-up. ;-)
            Since when is Michael a foreigner? Last time I checked he was American, born and raised.

            Comment

            • flower
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2018
              • 424

              #7
              Originally posted by timofonic View Post
              Let's make EXT5 with all the features of ZFS and BTRFS. After all, it's the most successful Linux filesystem.
              No thanks.
              The only feature missing from ext4 is data Checksumming. Which is useless anyway because all disks do a crc themselves anyway.

              Comment

              • Zan Lynx
                Senior Member
                • Jan 2012
                • 901

                #8
                Originally posted by flower View Post

                No thanks.
                The only feature missing from ext4 is data Checksumming. Which is useless anyway because all disks do a crc themselves anyway.
                If it is so useless then how did it catch a failing disk in my btrfs array back in 2014 or so?

                I had a Western Digital 2 TB drive that must have had some controller or cache RAM failure, because it returned zeroes for a set of blocks. You could write to those blocks, and it would return the new data for a while, then it was right back to zeroes. No block errors reported either.

                So much for disk CRC.

                Comment

                • Zan Lynx
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2012
                  • 901

                  #9
                  Oh look EXT4 has bugs. It must not be a stable filesystem! Quick everyone switch to ZFS!

                  Yeah, I like to say that because it's exactly what the btrfs critics say every time there's a bugfix release. It's just as ridiculous.

                  Comment

                  • flower
                    Senior Member
                    • Aug 2018
                    • 424

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Zan Lynx View Post

                    If it is so useless then how did it catch a failing disk in my btrfs array back in 2014 or so?

                    I had a Western Digital 2 TB drive that must have had some controller or cache RAM failure, because it returned zeroes for a set of blocks. You could write to those blocks, and it would return the new data for a while, then it was right back to zeroes. No block errors reported either.

                    So much for disk CRC.
                    dm-integrity

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X