Originally posted by Neraxa
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Reiser5 Updates For Linux 5.5 Along With Reiser4
Collapse
X
-
- Likes 2
-
Originally posted by CommunityMember View Post
While the name may be an issue for some (and so is the name GIMP to others for different reasons), I suspect the more important issue is the lack of a (clear) sustaining organization to maintain the filesystem, let alone make the changes that would be required to merge. With Namesys (the previous company which employed the filesystem developers) gone, there is simply not a sufficient number of active developers. And many of the features that were somewhat new with this filesystem have now been implemented or made available in other filesystems, making the case for this (yet another) filesystem less compelling. I expect that if changing the name to something like ShishkinFS (or TFFKAR (TheFilesystemFormerlyKnownAsReiser)) could generate substantial funding and substantial new developer interest that could, and would, have been done by now.
GIMPs initials happen to share characters with a word that in a certain regional dialect of English can be offensive.
ReiserFS is literally named after someone who killed his wife and hid her body.
To even put GIMP and ReiserFS in the same sentence is extraordinarly offensive to the GIMP developers.
Leave a comment:
-
The problem is/was Hans Reiser and his attitude. At some point he lost interest in ReiserFS
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
ReiserFS is a killer filesystem.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by cybertraveler View PostI used to use ReiserFS. It worked well for me.
If the code is high quality and there are no legal problems, I would like to see at least ReiserFS4 merged; especially if it solves the non-synchronous dir ops issue. It's mentioned on wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reiserfs#Criticism The way I used to use ReiserFS that wasn't a problem for me, but it was still a lingering itch in the back of my mind.
Leave a comment:
-
I used to use ReiserFS. It worked well for me.
If the code is high quality and there are no legal problems, I would like to see at least ReiserFS4 merged; especially if it solves the non-synchronous dir ops issue. It's mentioned on wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reiserfs#Criticism The way I used to use ReiserFS that wasn't a problem for me, but it was still a lingering itch in the back of my mind.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by cb88 View PostLinus should just come out and say it... no merge without rename.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: