Originally posted by torsionbar28
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Thunderbolt Is Seeing A Lot Of Improvements For Linux 5.2
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by nils_ View PostThey'll get to that in due time my good man
99.99% of current USB 3.0 devices aren't using controllers of a higher revision than the bare minimum needed to be USB 3.0 (aka 5Gbit/s), and even if they did it's irrelevant as most USB 3.0 host ports are still not really 10Gbit/s anyway.
Comment
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostYes but it won't matter just as it didn't with USB 3.0 revisions.
99.99% of current USB 3.0 devices aren't using controllers of a higher revision than the bare minimum needed to be USB 3.0 (aka 5Gbit/s), and even if they did it's irrelevant as most USB 3.0 host ports are still not really 10Gbit/s anyway.
Comment
-
Originally posted by nils_ View PostAnd then of course many CPUs don't have the PCIe/DMI lanes to support a larger number of ports (or even more than one).
Even with PCIe 5.0 lanes ( 4Gbit/s bidirectional) you would still need like 10 lanes to provide a single 40Gbit/s link for USB4.
With PCIe 4.0 you would need 20, and so on, doubling for each PCIe revision you decrease.
This is just silly, even on a tower PC.
These high-speed interfaces will get any traction once they are integrated in the main CPU die, just like PCIe, RAM and whatever else controllers.
There you don't have bandwith issues as the controller will be on the on-die interconnect bus.
Comment
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostEven with PCIe 5.0 lanes ( 4Gbit/s bidirectional) you would still need like 10 lanes to provide a single 40Gbit/s link for USB4.
With PCIe 4.0 you would need 20, and so on, doubling for each PCIe revision you decrease.
This is just silly, even on a tower PC.
Comment
Comment