Originally posted by linner
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Linux 5.0-rc6 Released - Still On Track For A Normal Release
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by linner View PostThe kernel used to follow the traditional model.
version.version.xx = bug updates
version.xx.version = added features
xx.version.version = major rewrites, fundamental architecture changes, etc.
Nowadays, according to places like Google, Microsoft, and everyone that copies this (eg. Mozilla):
version.version.xx = ???
version.xx.version = ???
xx.version.version = added features and bugfixes
WTF...
Guys, the kernel is 27 years old.
Using the "current" scheme we'd probably have Linux 13 by now (say, one every 2 years). Even more otherwise. It's pathetic.
Leave a comment:
-
The kernel used to follow the traditional model.
version.version.xx = bug updates
version.xx.version = added features
xx.version.version = major rewrites, fundamental architecture changes, etc.
Nowadays, according to places like Google, Microsoft, and everyone that copies this (eg. Mozilla):
version.version.xx = ???
version.xx.version = ???
xx.version.version = added features and bugfixes
WTF...
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by linner View PostI have to admit that the kernel versioning really bothers me. I mean judging based on features I would say the latest kernel would still be part of the 2.x series or maybe 3.x at most. Version 5? LOL, not even close. The Googlification/Microsoftification/gaming of versioning for everything is pissing me off. Why does everyone want to copy an evil company like Google?
Seriously thou, it's not like the Linux kernel devs can really do those huge version overhauls that companies who release a new version of their OS every few years at least used to do when you have multiple new versions every year. These days OS development in general is much more iterative so you just can't do big under-the-surface overhauls in one version like many Windows versions prior to 8 or MacOS and iOS prior to those moving to a yearly release schedule.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by linner View PostI have to admit that the kernel versioning really bothers me. I mean judging based on features I would say the latest kernel would still be part of the 2.x series or maybe 3.x at most. Version 5? LOL, not even close. The Googlification/Microsoftification/gaming of versioning for everything is pissing me off. Why does everyone want to copy an evil company like Google?
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Spam View PostVersion numbers used to mean something. What's the point to increase major versions for the sake of nothing but the number itself?
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by linner View PostI have to admit that the kernel versioning really bothers me. I mean judging based on features I would say the latest kernel would still be part of the 2.x series or maybe 3.x at most. Version 5? LOL, not even close. The Googlification/Microsoftification/gaming of versioning for everything is pissing me off. Why does everyone want to copy an evil company like Google?
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Version numbers used to mean something. What's the point to increase major versions for the sake of nothing but the number itself?
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
I have to admit that the kernel versioning really bothers me. I mean judging based on features I would say the latest kernel would still be part of the 2.x series or maybe 3.x at most. Version 5? LOL, not even close. The Googlification/Microsoftification/gaming of versioning for everything is pissing me off. Why does everyone want to copy an evil company like Google?
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Manual fix for amdgpu (resume from suspend and DP 1.2) is still needed. But developers said the fix should be in before final 5.0 release.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: