Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Linux 5.0-rc6 Released - Still On Track For A Normal Release

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by linner View Post
    The kernel used to follow the traditional model.

    version.version.xx = bug updates
    version.xx.version = added features
    xx.version.version = major rewrites, fundamental architecture changes, etc.

    Nowadays, according to places like Google, Microsoft, and everyone that copies this (eg. Mozilla):
    version.version.xx = ???
    version.xx.version = ???
    xx.version.version = added features and bugfixes

    WTF...
    Fully agree with you.

    Guys, the kernel is 27 years old.

    Using the "current" scheme we'd probably have Linux 13 by now (say, one every 2 years). Even more otherwise. It's pathetic.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by linner View Post
      The kernel used to follow the traditional model.

      version.version.xx = bug updates
      version.xx.version = added features
      xx.version.version = major rewrites, fundamental architecture changes, etc.

      Nowadays, according to places like Google, Microsoft, and everyone that copies this (eg. Mozilla):
      version.version.xx = ???
      version.xx.version = ???
      xx.version.version = added features and bugfixes

      WTF...
      I agree. However it really does seem that every new kernel is not compatible with any previous versions. This is why we have to recompile modules for every minor version anyway ... Imagine if the same graphics drivers work for all kernel version within the same major branch. I think this problem is in fact costing the community a lot...

      Comment

      Working...
      X