Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Linux 5.0-RC2 Kernel Released

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • waxhead
    replied
    Originally posted by tildearrow View Post

    Why can't we skip 20? e.g. 5.19 -> 5.21
    Inspired y Winamp's insane "so good we skipped a version" (just that this in fact a revision)?.
    Or better yet , after 5.19 we could use negative numbers... 5.-1 until we reach 5.-19 ... yeah! That's the stuff!

    Leave a comment:


  • tildearrow
    replied
    Originally posted by waxhead View Post

    After v9 it obviously have to be 0xA . The only way to survive the dreadded number 20 for a while us to count in hexadecimal
    Why can't we skip 20? e.g. 5.19 -> 5.21

    Leave a comment:


  • waxhead
    replied
    Originally posted by cl333r View Post
    Since 20 is the reset number, what will they do when Linux gets to version 20?
    After v9 it obviously have to be 0xA . The only way to survive the dreadded number 20 for a while us to count in hexadecimal

    Leave a comment:


  • tildearrow
    replied
    Originally posted by debianxfce View Post

    Nobody is interested to test a whole day waiting for a bug appear. When you do bug reports, you should trigger the bug faster and repeat it. There are many reasons for random crashes from hardware to the desktop. Your writings are against the net etiquette. Many people do sleep and their computers are not powered while sleeping.
    Whar about bugs that do require a long time before they occur? (e.g. https://blog.ctm-it.com/it-support/b...-kills-windows)

    ​​​​Why would clapbr's writings be "against the net etiquette" when every single thing clapbr said is VERY true? They all are frustrated and tired from your posts and they have to be honest.

    Leave a comment:


  • Etherman
    replied
    Linux 5000

    Leave a comment:


  • nils_
    replied
    Originally posted by cl333r View Post
    Since 20 is the reset number, what will they do when Linux gets to version 20?
    it will be called Linux NT 1.0 after that

    Leave a comment:


  • nils_
    replied
    Originally posted by lox_ View Post
    Will ZFS be supported ? I use it on some servers ...
    It usually takes a bit of time for ZFS support the current mainline, though to me it feels that this is has improved in recent times. I went off ZFS for a lot of boxes though.

    Leave a comment:


  • WonkoTheSaneUK
    replied
    Originally posted by lox_ View Post
    Will ZFS be supported ? I use it on some servers ...
    Apparently it won't even compile, as it depends on some kernel symbols that were depracated over a decade ago.

    https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pa...ux-5.0-Problem
    Last edited by WonkoTheSaneUK; 14 January 2019, 08:01 AM. Reason: EDIT: Link added

    Leave a comment:


  • clapbr
    replied
    it had to be this clown again right?

    Yeah dude. Me, Michael and everyone else that has this bug are idiots. The guy who ALREADY **CKING bisected it is also an idiot.

    Oh and nice uptime btw, my rc2 at least ran for a full day before crashing. I doubt your OS ever ran for a couple of days judging by the amount of bullshit and misinfo you spread everywhere.

    Leave a comment:


  • lox_
    replied
    Will ZFS be supported ? I use it on some servers ...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X