Originally posted by birdie
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Linux 5.0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. F2FS vs. XFS
Collapse
X
-
- Likes 10
-
Originally posted by Danielsan View PostRecovering data from an encrypted drive damaged or messed-up is almost impossible, I have much more personal experience of hard-drives broken than computers stolen, and between the two risks I prefer keep my hard-drivers unencrypted.
- Likes 5
Comment
-
Originally posted by linner View Post
Crazy! This is one of those things you don't think can happen to you, until it does. What if someone steals your computer? You want them to have access to everything?! With modern CPU's encryption costs practically nothing, there is no reason not to do it.
- Likes 5
Comment
-
Originally posted by phoronix View PostPhoronix: Linux 5.0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. F2FS vs. XFS
With all of the major file-systems seeing clean-up work during the Linux 4.21 merge window (now known as Linux 5.0 and particularly with F2FS seeing fixes as a result of it being picked up by Google for support on Pixel devices, I was curious to see how the current popular mainline file-system choices compare for performance. Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS were tested on a SATA 3.0 solid-state drive, USB SSD, and an NVMe SSD.
http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=27370
Comment
-
Originally posted by linner View PostCrazy! This is one of those things you don't think can happen to you, until it does. What if someone steals your computer? You want them to have access to everything?! With modern CPU's encryption costs practically nothing, there is no reason not to do it.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by F.Ultra View Post
I also run all my drive both at home and at work unencrypted. Every piece of sensitive data however is stored encrypted in e.g KeePassX and so on. There is no need to emply full disk encryption when the real sensitive data amounts to fractions of the data on the drives.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Full disk encryption is no must imo, and I don't apply it anywhere, neither at work, because it opens up more potential issues and gives less user experience. Instead I create encrypted containers for specific data that is sensitive enough to store unencrypted and if possible only opened when necessary.
And for servers that run most of the time, there's generally more risk of a virtual attack that can get your data damaged or stolen than physically, fde doesn't hell with that at all.
Plus looking at benchmarks and having done several myself, even on modern cpus that performance drop is relevant, especially on hdds, and very much for specific workloads
Full disk encryption however is a must for mobile phones for me though. Those are devices that ALWAYS contain sensitive data, whether you realise it or not.
- Likes 3
Comment
Comment