Originally posted by oiaohm
View Post
Becasue as I recall it, it was "S"ystem"D", at beginning..and so I tend to call the things with its Original names on them..
But I also can call it "S"ystem"D"own,
To please some people that use the moron tag, and don´t know of it yet( humm maybe they never will.. )
But never mind...
Can you imagine a Unix guy calling a init system "S"ystem"D"???
Even if it came from Alpha Centaurus in a blue space ship?
Even then, can you still imagine that??
Starting by the name,
It speaks volumes about the Culture behind, those Windows Hybrid coders..but its not their fault...
The real fault needs to be pointed to RedHat project Managers... pure incompetence!
They put those kids coding, like if they were creating a self contained application..and what those kids knew was Windows,they breathe Windows..
They want to come to Gnu/Linux, because Linux is a trend now, and that is good, but also have its negative side..
I happens to be present at some keypoint Interviews for Jobs, none of the candidates. would be, even in a parallel life capable of naming an Init as "S"ystem"D", those guys don´t pass from first stage of interviews..
And I am not speaking about colour, sex, or race,on the contrary,
I am speaking about Unix Culture Philosophy and Respect for what it represent...
A guy naming a init system "S"ystem"D", has **none** of them, and everything to go wrong..
Comment