Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Linux Poised To Remove Decade-Old EXOFS File-System

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Linux Poised To Remove Decade-Old EXOFS File-System

    Phoronix: Linux Poised To Remove Decade-Old EXOFS File-System

    The Linux kernel will likely be doing away with EXOFS, a file-system that had been around since the Linux 2.6.30 days...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Good rid-off-nce

    Comment


    • #3
      I just can't stop wondering for how long vFAT support has been around. It's ridiculous, remove it asap.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by eydee View Post
        I just can't stop wondering for how long vFAT support has been around. It's ridiculous, remove it asap.
        Come on, if you want to troll, you have to try harder.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by brent View Post

          Come on, if you want to troll, you have to try harder.
          Now that HFS+ is no longer in use on Mac OSX and it's clear we're never getting journaled read/write support it should be removed from the kernel.

          Comment


          • #6
            2.6.30 is (almost) decade old? i would not have thought, but it seems true.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by brent View Post

              Come on, if you want to troll, you have to try harder.
              ext2 and ext3 should go.
              >4TiB-32TiB volume size limit
              >16GiB-2TiB file size limit
              >1901-2038 date range
              Seriously. I've encountered database dumps that would exhaust this kind of file size limit and backup partitions that would exhaust this volume size limit 4 times. Even with 8KiB block size.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by rmoog View Post

                ext2 and ext3 should go.
                >4TiB-32TiB volume size limit
                >16GiB-2TiB file size limit
                >1901-2038 date range
                Seriously. I've encountered database dumps that would exhaust this kind of file size limit and backup partitions that would exhaust this volume size limit 4 times. Even with 8KiB block size.
                Well, as we are trolling: ext4 should go too... btrfs has everything and more.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by quikee View Post
                  btrfs has everything
                  Ow the edge. Too soon.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by rmoog View Post

                    ext2 and ext3 should go.
                    >4TiB-32TiB volume size limit
                    >16GiB-2TiB file size limit
                    >1901-2038 date range
                    Seriously. I've encountered database dumps that would exhaust this kind of file size limit and backup partitions that would exhaust this volume size limit 4 times. Even with 8KiB block size.
                    ext4 is forward compatible to ext2/ext3. You can mount an ext2/ext3 filesystem with the ext4 driver and it'll just work. The only downside is that you may not be able to mount it as ext2/ext3 again. So this is actually quite reasonable.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X