Real World Benchmarks Of The EXT4 File-System

[energyman]

just look at lkml.
Every month you will see reports for fs corruption and bugs - xfs and ext3.
You hardly ever see a report for reiserfs.
And it wasn't dropped because it was unstable - it was dropped because Namesys wasn't willing to add any new features. They wanted to put reiserfs in maintanace only mode. ext3 is much 'better' constantly adding features - and bugs.

[deanjo]

But please stop spreading bull**** about its unreliability.
.

Your lucky, that was not the case 3 years ago when openSUSE dropped it from being the default filesystem. Feel free to look around at the mailing lists from back then.

[reavertm]

I'm using reiserfs ('3') for at least 5 years and I never ever had any data loss nor filesystem corruption. It handled perfectly every power loss I occured. It's rock stable and is eating alive ext3 when it comes to performance.
Recovering accidentally *deleted* files is another topic as it may be problematic, especially when you have some reiserfs file image on partition being recovered.
Other disadvantages (the only actually) of reiserfs are longer mount time and reasonably higher CPU usage. But please stop spreading bull**** about its unreliability.

On the other hand I remember quite often problems with ext3 and it caused for me to forget about ext* forever for anything except /boot.

[energyman]

Chewi, it is associated with one 'weirdo' because of people like you who can't see behind technical merits.

[Chewi]

Hahaha. What is with this guy? I thought ReiserFS was okay but geez. ReiserFS and Reiser4 are already associated with one weirdo too many.

[Jade]

Why is no JFS benched? It's the fastest FS for Linux

No it is not. Reiser4 is the fastest. See:

http://linux.50webs.org/

http://linuxhelp.150m.com/resources/fs-benchmarks.htm

http://m.domaindlx.com/LinuxHelp/resources/fs-benchmarks.htm

[thacrazze]

Why isno JFS benched? It's the fastest FS for Linux and it supports 64bit since a lot of years.

[kebabbert]

JADE,

You know, it is nice that you share your opinions about the jews with us. But that is not facts, as you can not back them up with links. So please stay on topic then, when you discuss your opinions? Back to file systems.

[energyman]

resierfs IS NOT reiser4

god people, don't you know anything?

reiserfs = reiserfs 3.5&3.6
reiser4 = reiser4

no 'reiserfs' for 4, and no 4 in reiserfs. Two completly different file systems.

Get your facts straight, before you look completly silly, ok?
Oh, and jade - all the points you might have are invalidated by your idiotic (yes, I said it), conspracy theories and jew hating.

[drag]

Suse supporting Reiserfs in a meaningful way would mean that they support using v4 as a install option. Which they don't.

Reiser4 was supported by SuSE till they were bought out by the Jews. The Jews already owned Redhat, so there was no competition.

So the Jews hate ReiserFS?

--------------------

My good sir.

You are either serious and happen to be borderline insane; Or are a batshit insane troll. Either way you have too much time on your hands and seem to have a almost complete lack of critical thinking skills.

I suggest a double dose of a BS degree in liberal arts at a very high quality private university (the more conservative the better) combined with counseling. From looking at your website you seem to have some serious delusions and possibly schizophrenic tendencies. If you already have a person your seeing, fire him/her, and if you already have a degree try to get your money back to pay for a better one.

And probably some better religion, if your into that sort of thing. It's helped lots of people in the past get a better grounding.

I may sound insulting, but it's really for your own benefit.