Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Dbus-Broker Is Still A Faster User-Space-Based D-Bus

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dbus-Broker Is Still A Faster User-Space-Based D-Bus

    Phoronix: Dbus-Broker Is Still A Faster User-Space-Based D-Bus

    With BUS1 still appearing out in the distant for the mainline Linux kernel as an in-kernel IPC mechanism, dbus-broker is the year-and-a-half long effort so far at making a faster D-Bus compliant implementation in user-space...

    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...roker-ASG-2018

  • #2
    systemd? Does dbus-broker require systemd, or is it just to attract forum posts?

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by tildearrow View Post
      systemd? Does dbus-broker require systemd, or is it just to attract forum posts?
      If using its compatibility launcher, systemd is required. Yes and there wasn't really a better category to use plus ASG effectively being what was the systemd conference.
      Michael Larabel
      http://www.michaellarabel.com/

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by tildearrow View Post
        systemd? Does dbus-broker require systemd, or is it just to attract forum posts?
        Everything requires systemd these days!!!!!!!!

        Comment


        • #5
          2 of 7 links don't point back to phoronix, is anything ok over there?

          Comment


          • #6
            Linus himself had to tell them that the performance problem of dbus was in the poor implementation, not in the context switches. I'm glad they finally figured that out.

            Comment


            • #7
              Would this yield any performance benefit for desktop use?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by gens View Post
                Linus himself had to tell them that the performance problem of dbus was in the poor implementation, not in the context switches. I'm glad they finally figured that out.
                Performance wasn't the only thing they were after, they also wanted fine-grained security. The latter is now being implemented through at least dbus-proxy (which has a performance impact compared to kdbus)

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by gens View Post
                  Linus himself had to tell them that the performance problem of dbus was in the poor implementation, not in the context switches. I'm glad they finally figured that out.
                  nobody figured that out except you. reimplementing dbus daemon does not make context switches magically go away, so they still present performance problem

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Vistaus View Post

                    Everything requires systemd these days!!!!!!!!
                    I suspect Vistaus' post is meant as /sarcasm but I can but offer the following in rebuttal":

                    All of the systemD fanboi community would say, "NO WAY! Look at the documentation on http://<whatever> and you will find that everything is OPTIONAL. It all depends upon how systemD was built for your distribution."
                    Last edited by NotMine999; 10-04-2018, 01:14 AM. Reason: Fix a typo

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X