Originally posted by GunpowaderGuy
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Systemd Introduces "Portable Services" Functionality, Similar To Containers
Collapse
X
-
An interesting concept, not having to worry about packaging for many vastly different distros would be a definite plus (and I guess this is the main purpose of systemd, to reduce the complexity). Having your own little "world" to live in I can see a plus side too.
Being able to remove something entirely and cleanly is both nice and could be rather bad - e.g. nuking your entire apache2/nginx/postgres/email server config.
Comment
-
So ,it's an umbrella of projects that often require each other to work ( because of deliberately being designed monolithically ) despite covering increasingly unrelated ground ; which was already well covered such in this case ; only works on Linux and uses a copyleft license but encourages other projects to depend on it ( ex : gnome )Last edited by GunpowaderGuy; 25 May 2018, 01:49 PM.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Their main difference is that the use a different root directory than the rest of the system. Hence, the intention is not to run code in a different, isolated world from the host — like most containers would do it —, but to run it in the same world, but with stricter access controls on what the service can see and do.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by GunpowaderGuy View PostSo ,it's an umbrella of projects that often require each other to work ( because of deliberately being designed monolithically ) despite covering increasingly unrelated ground ; which was already well covered such in this case ; only works on Linux and uses a copyleft license but encourages other projects to depend on it ( ex : gnome )
- Likes 8
Comment
-
Originally posted by tg-- View Post
Nope, as the name implies it was from the start intended to be a system and service management daemon.
Comment
Comment