Originally posted by shmerl
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Red Hat Plans To Deploy Next-Gen Stratis Storage For Fedora 28
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by OneBitUser View Post
Not Invented Here.
Plus I guess RH wants total control over the direction in which their filesystem is developed.
Unfortunately, existing VMFs aren’t easily used on RHEL. ZFS isn’t an option RHEL can embrace due to licensing (Ubuntu notwithstanding.) Btrfs has no licensing issues, but after many years of work it still has significant technical issues that may never be resolved.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by untore View Postfrom the stratis doc
Unfortunately, existing VMFs aren’t easily used on RHEL. ZFS isn’t an option RHEL can embrace due to licensing (Ubuntu notwithstanding.) Btrfs has no licensing issues, but after many years of work it still has significant technical issues that may never be resolved.
These two efforts will go on in parallel, likely informing the development of both Stratis (device-mapper + XFS + integration layer) and LVM2 (RH contributed patches).
Comment
-
Originally posted by debianxfce View PostNobody uses bluetooth for the internet traffic.
(I even have older PDAs that do Bluetooth DUN)
Originally posted by untore View PostAlso if you read more you find out it is not a new filesystem but a layer that uses lvm,xfs,etc to achieve the same things offered by btrfs/zfs
Currently XFS doesn't support Copy-on-Write or Log-structured, instead it writes inplace like ext4/3/2. I prefere FS that are gentler on my flash media, like BTRFS, ZFS, UDF, F2FS,etc. (But work has begun to add this feature)
Currently, LVM can only offer full-volume snapshotting.
BTRFS and ZFS offer much more features :
- multiple subvolume snapshots used in parallel (which is absolutely over-used by some containers systems like docker)
- reflinking, accross subvolume (important for some backup strategies, and also for dedup in general).
(Also, my distro is openSuSE which seem to be rather competent at putting a working BTRFS system together).
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by shmerl View PostWhat's their main reason to make a new filesystem, instead of improving Btrfs or ZFS?
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by InsideJob View PostI agree 100%, Red Hat is a fascist corporate entity.
You FBI dudes... erhm I mean "conspiracy theorists" should up your game if you really want to smokescreen .... erhm I mean "open sheeple's eyes" properly.
Comment
-
Originally posted by lkundrak View Post
Thanks for letting the rest of the anonymous internet users know.
What are the particular bugs that bother you in NetworkManager?
Well I've personally found that NetworkManager was still acting strange in bridge configurations. For example: Although physical interface was going though a bridge, it was still available in NetworkManager GUI for activation and once this was done there was some non easily reversible issues and possibly even connection lost. So unfortunately I am still disabling NetworkManager service when bridge is present.
Comment
Comment