Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Manjaro Linux To Drop 32-bit Support

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • phoronix
    started a topic Manjaro Linux To Drop 32-bit Support

    Manjaro Linux To Drop 32-bit Support

    Phoronix: Manjaro Linux To Drop 32-bit Support

    The Arch-based Manjaro Linux distribution is deciding to retire their x86 32-bit support...

    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...-Dropping-i686

  • starshipeleven
    replied
    Originally posted by Bucic View Post
    Congratulations sdack. This has to be the most obnoxious 'in defence of the venerable cruft' I have ever witnessed. 8-|
    To be fair, there were many strong contenders for that title in this thread.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bucic
    replied
    Congratulations sdack. This has to be the most obnoxious 'in defence of the venerable cruft' I have ever witnessed. 8-|

    Leave a comment:


  • Weasel
    replied
    Originally posted by starshipeleven View Post
    You didn't provide any logical, practical reason why keeping 32-bit on a PC system is required. I don't respect irrational beliefs, especially on the Internet.
    It uses less memory / disk space especially if you have to run 32-bit apps (multilib is cool but you'd need more resources to use it on a 64-bit system). Pretty important for some use cases. For example, one of them is VMs. It might shock you, but VMs need an OS to work as well, so the OS has to be available. 64-bit in a lightweight VM is total redundancy, I'd say lunacy, but I know most people think with fashion sense more than with rationality.

    Thus for lightweight VMs 32-bit makes far more sense, especially if you want to run 32-bit apps in them (not requiring multilib). Not all use-cases of OS isos are done on real hardware.

    When you don't even need 4GB of RAM it's pathetic to waste 4 extra bytes on every pointer, total redundancy, that's what I call irrational. You asked for a rational reason. There's nothing rational about being a purist and redundant calculations, which is what 64-bit is to everyone who is comfortable with 32-bit on a specific system (not all systems, people can use both, if given the choice).

    "But more registers" nobody mentioned anything about performance, but about memory/disk USAGE. Plus, more memory (redundant pointers, again, in 64-bit, 100% overhead for them) means less cache utilization, there's a reason you sometimes see benchmarks where 64-bit is *slower* at some tasks that aren't computing intensive. Deal with it.

    I know you won't want to believe that other people just live life and use computers differently than your "fashion statement purist" user, but you asked for rational reason, and I gave it.

    What rational reason is there to use 64-bit on a system with less than 4GB RAM? (or a lightweight VM with less than 4GB RAM)
    More registers? What if I don't care about computing-intensive tasks, or what if it's actually *slower* due to worse cache usage?

    Not only more RAM use/disk space usage, but can also be slower, redundancy is never rational.

    Leave a comment:


  • kon14
    replied
    Originally posted by torsionbar28 View Post

    Except that these machines are still commonplace in much of the world. Of course, you can sit in your affluent white privilege home and look down your nose at people who can't afford your 64 bit lifestyle. But classrooms across Africa depend on 32 bit x86 hardware. Do you hate all black people? Or just black children who are trying to learn computers? Folks, we can thank Obama for perpetuating this kind of arrogance and hate, while calling it "progress".
    I guess you clicked the wrong tumblr bookmark? I swear you can't be anywhere online today without some delusional self hating while feminist sjw dude trying to guilt trip people, in a completely irrelevant conversation, into hating themselves and the white race.

    Nobody ever suggested that 32bit x86 be wiped off the surface of our history and it's not going to be deprecated in kernel or important system software any time soon.
    People in Africa are most likely not using Manjaro and if they do and can't keep up with technology after decades they should just go ahead and install a legacy distro like everyone else around the world. Besides, most of them are probably not using x86 at all, especially after the raspberry pi and other extremely affordable arm boards came to be.

    Nobody is discriminating on anyone, intentionally or not, but you and your kind.
    You're the ones that have to squeeze hatred out of everything and won't let people live happily ever after forcing them to hate each other eternally, so just take your off-topic bullshit and shove it up your sorry self.

    Leave a comment:


  • torsionbar28
    replied
    Originally posted by starshipeleven View Post
    Listen, 32-bit hardware on PC is pretty much obsolete bullshit, or stuff that should have never been made (old-gen Atom processors I'm looking at you).

    We are talking of first-gen Core processors and older, or crappy netbooks. That hardware is already plagued by crappy processors, usually 2GB max ram and crappy integrated GPU too, obsolete expansion interfaces and so on and so forth.
    Except that these machines are still commonplace in much of the world. Of course, you can sit in your affluent white privilege home and look down your nose at people who can't afford your 64 bit lifestyle. But classrooms across Africa depend on 32 bit x86 hardware. Do you hate all black people? Or just black children who are trying to learn computers? Folks, we can thank Obama for perpetuating this kind of arrogance and hate, while calling it "progress".
    Last edited by torsionbar28; 09-07-2017, 11:53 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • trek
    replied
    Originally posted by sa666666 View Post
    When are some people going to accept that 32-bit is dying/dead, and it WILL disappear soon. Why not get ahead of the curve (which we're already behind on anyway), and just get with the times?? It is going to happen; why not just accept it and embrace it?
    to save the environment? the pollution generated to produce a new computer and the waste disposal of the old one is quite big, so if you delay the purchase of a new computer, you delay the destruction of the planet Earth

    even if new hardware consumes less energy, the amount of energy needed to produce a computer is ~5 times more than the electricity consumed during its entire lifespan: https://books.google.it/books?id=FLKvBQAAQBAJ&pg=PT236

    Leave a comment:


  • kon14
    replied
    Originally posted by grok View Post
    As Arch 32bit "disappears" there's 32bit community iso from day one. It's what I expected and is a very decent arrangement, don't have i686 iso QA and validation block the main project. I'll like if i686 stays "dead" in that way. I guess we might see something similar with Ubuntu - 18.10 drops i686 but I think we'll live to see unofficial Ubuntu 20.04 iso for i686.
    You can find even Ubuntu Mate for PowerPC Mac, even though that's been "dead" for a while. If I get an iMac G5 that what it'll see without even booting even once in the deprecated Apple OS.
    I bet you won't find as many people eager to continue doing this after distro's upstream actually stops building 32bit packages for these guys to use in these isos.
    Dropping 32bit images has nothing to do with dropping 32bit altogether (which won't happen any time soon anyway) or only providing basic 32bit mulilib deps ofc.
    They could build them themselves, but people in lesser distros would be less willing to do it for even less people.
    Last edited by kon14; 09-05-2017, 01:49 PM. Reason: typos

    Leave a comment:


  • starshipeleven
    replied
    Originally posted by grok View Post
    I have a deprecated DX11 GPU on my 64bit CPU, 64bit linux PC. With 64bit graphics memory. I can't dream of 3D graphics in Virtualbox. It's also an awesome oxymoron, deprecated DX11 GPU.
    No wait a sec, how can it be a DX11 GPU deprecated on Linux?

    I'm a dumb old fuck I guess, if some HTML5 thing is slow as fuck I blame it or I blame myself for running it, or I will find workarounds e.g. if I somehow need smooth youtube vids on slower than Atom I know I can achieve it with the right software. $50 phones and what not are not the only things that achieve it.

    If I somehow spend 100% CPU power reading internet music on a PC dedicated to music playback I can deal with it (it happened, streaming things like deezer and soundcloud and youtube on a Pentium 3). This was when Flash was still needed and didn't require SSE2. I'm trained to fight and avoid swap hell. So five seconds of GUI lag while there are megabytes of free RAM and no sound frames are dropped don't scare me.
    Heh, that's fine. As long as you recognize that most people just don't see the point of babysitting a PC or waiting 5 seconds between clicks when with a 50$ rig they can get everything running smoothly

    Leave a comment:


  • starshipeleven
    replied
    Originally posted by sdack View Post
    It's sadly not edge cases, but it's small businesses who suffer from it the most.
    FYI: I'm in IT and the company I work with does IT support for small businness.

    Can confirm that none is impacted by some PC-oriented linux distros switching off 32-bit support. Pretty much all 32-bit-only systems still run XP, and they won't be upgraded, period.

    We've seen this with Microsoft beginning with Windows (where companies got stuck on MS/DOS) and it's happening with Linux, too,
    FYI: normal companies refresh their hardware fleet every 5-10 years just because they need a new Windows version and can't be arsed to migrate their hardware

    When you then see companies who have switched to Linux, but then are stuck on old distros with Firefox 11, which fails to open every second website (while the latest version currently is at 55) and thus regret their switch to Linux, perhaps then you'd begin to understand.
    Would be interesting to know why they are stuck at FF11 to begin with.

    The NHS would be safer if they ran Linux, but at the pace they are capable of maintaining and spending money on IT (instead of spending it on medical equipment and salaries), would they only be looking at another massive problem.
    Hahahaha no. There the issue is that the IT management are idiots, not that they don't have money or whatever. Even with linux thry would manage to do stupid shit (see the FF11 issue you talked about above).

    I'm wasting my time here when I'm explaining the problems others have with the IT industry.
    You only provided examples of bad IT management, which is the main issue in the IT industry.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X